Reddit, Mozilla to stage Fourth of July protest against NSA spying(thehill.com)
thehill.com
Reddit, Mozilla to stage Fourth of July protest against NSA spying
http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/308931-reddit-mozilla-and-privacy-groups-to-launch-protests-against-nsa-surveillance-programs
45 comments
I'm legitimately interested in how I'm affected by this as a person who doesn't conduct activity online that the NSA would ever care about. Can someone help me out here?
Sure, here's a little hypothetical story:
2014 arrives, and your information is being stored indefinitely. Let's say you're interested in comics and you store some on your github account. One of those comics is V for Vendetta or some other innocuous story. You delete the comics pretty quickly, so after a few months there's nothing there, but the record stays because the file was once transmitted. Nobody cares at this point, but the information is stored.
2015, and your phone records are used to pinpoint your location at a known collection point for subversives (a comic shop). Known terrorist symphasers used this shop as a meeting point in 2013 and 2015 (animal rights terrorists), which puts you with them. You're now on a watch list along with 10 million other Americans - no-one is ever taken off the list once they go on.
2018 arrives, with a new president who's hard on security and terrorism and subversive literature is banned, including some strange titles like the bomb-makers handbook. You're not too worried about this, as who would read that sort of thing, right? Unknown to you, one of your students has been reading it, and shared the link to you on a page linked in an email, so that link goes in your file. The student also voices subversive thoughts to you, and you don't report them.
2020 arrives, and more materials judged subversive are banned, including certain comics judged too subversive and supportive of terrorism. Due to advances in storage tech and analysis, the NSA can now go back to 2014, and every year after, and see exactly what banned information you've been trafficking in, along with analysing documents linked in emails, and your location at every point in your life. 100 million Americans are now on the list, because so many subversives are being found with the new technology. It seems there are a lot of enemies within. The new president is worried and orders more surveillance.
2022, and you are pulled in for questioning due to your suspicious profile. No matter how you protest your innocence, it seems no-one will listen - the facts are just too damning, and your lawyer can't find you because your arrest was secret. You're just another traitor and terrorist sympathiser. You end up in a black site for 5 years, and are released a broken man.
The technical advances to make this possible are just developing, but it will soon be a reality, so I do believe we need restrictions on the collection and storage of this sort of information - it's just not good enough to leave that decision to the intelligence services, because they will naturally want to keep everything, and analyze everything, and grow their power. We need a check on that power which is not technical but enshrined in law - at present those laws are being ignored.
Sure, here's a little hypothetical story:
2014 arrives, and your information is being stored indefinitely. Let's say you're interested in comics and you store some on your github account. One of those comics is V for Vendetta or some other innocuous story. You delete the comics pretty quickly, so after a few months there's nothing there, but the record stays because the file was once transmitted. Nobody cares at this point, but the information is stored.
2015, and your phone records are used to pinpoint your location at a known collection point for subversives (a comic shop). Known terrorist symphasers used this shop as a meeting point in 2013 and 2015 (animal rights terrorists), which puts you with them. You're now on a watch list along with 10 million other Americans - no-one is ever taken off the list once they go on.
2018 arrives, with a new president who's hard on security and terrorism and subversive literature is banned, including some strange titles like the bomb-makers handbook. You're not too worried about this, as who would read that sort of thing, right? Unknown to you, one of your students has been reading it, and shared the link to you on a page linked in an email, so that link goes in your file. The student also voices subversive thoughts to you, and you don't report them.
2020 arrives, and more materials judged subversive are banned, including certain comics judged too subversive and supportive of terrorism. Due to advances in storage tech and analysis, the NSA can now go back to 2014, and every year after, and see exactly what banned information you've been trafficking in, along with analysing documents linked in emails, and your location at every point in your life. 100 million Americans are now on the list, because so many subversives are being found with the new technology. It seems there are a lot of enemies within. The new president is worried and orders more surveillance.
2022, and you are pulled in for questioning due to your suspicious profile. No matter how you protest your innocence, it seems no-one will listen - the facts are just too damning, and your lawyer can't find you because your arrest was secret. You're just another traitor and terrorist sympathiser. You end up in a black site for 5 years, and are released a broken man.
The technical advances to make this possible are just developing, but it will soon be a reality, so I do believe we need restrictions on the collection and storage of this sort of information - it's just not good enough to leave that decision to the intelligence services, because they will naturally want to keep everything, and analyze everything, and grow their power. We need a check on that power which is not technical but enshrined in law - at present those laws are being ignored.
| We need a check on that power which is not
| technical but enshrined in law - at present
| those laws are being ignored.
A law which more specifically limits surveillance, as opposed to the broad permissions which are given at present. In the UK especially we have practically no supervision on this surveillance, and there are loopholes of sharing data between nations, which is happening without permission.
dgunn, what a lot of people are upset over isn't necessarily that the government is recording a lot of conversations per se. It's the fact that this program is constitutionally and ethically questionable and that it was enacted without any public debate or supervision whatsoever. America behaves in some ways like a democracy, and big issues like this deserve to be discussed and weighed in the public forum.
In general, the government taking powers and responsibilities upon itself without a public discussion tends to be a bad deal for everyone. We've all lived under presidents that we didn't particularly like or trust. If we let the executive branch off the hook for behaving this way that reinforces executive independence and gives more legitimacy to the next guy, who we may like even less, to do something even worse.
There are exceptions, explicit and implied, to this process for states of emergency when decisive action needs to be taken immediately. But it's untenable to claim that America has been in a continuous state of emergency for the past twelve years and that there hasn't been a moment to step back and evaluate where we're at -- and where we're going.
In general, the government taking powers and responsibilities upon itself without a public discussion tends to be a bad deal for everyone. We've all lived under presidents that we didn't particularly like or trust. If we let the executive branch off the hook for behaving this way that reinforces executive independence and gives more legitimacy to the next guy, who we may like even less, to do something even worse.
There are exceptions, explicit and implied, to this process for states of emergency when decisive action needs to be taken immediately. But it's untenable to claim that America has been in a continuous state of emergency for the past twelve years and that there hasn't been a moment to step back and evaluate where we're at -- and where we're going.
The July 4th demonstrations seek to demand an end to the unconstitutional surveillance methods employed by the U.S. government and to ensure that all future government surveillance is constitutional, limited, and clearly defined.
More spefically, three points are called out in Restore the Fourth's press release, on StopWatching.us's site, and in an open letter that 80+ groups including EFF, BORDC, etc. signed on to:
1. Enact reform this Congress to Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act, the state secrets privilege, and the FISA Amendments Act to make clear that blanket surveillance of the Internet activity and phone records of any person residing in the U.S. is prohibited by law and that violations can be reviewed in adversarial proceedings before a public court;
2. Create a special committee to investigate, report, and reveal to the public the extent of this domestic spying. This committee should create specific recommendations for legaland regulatory reform to end unconstitutional surveillance;
3. Hold accountable those public officials who are found to be responsible for this unconstitutional surveillance.
More spefically, three points are called out in Restore the Fourth's press release, on StopWatching.us's site, and in an open letter that 80+ groups including EFF, BORDC, etc. signed on to:
1. Enact reform this Congress to Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act, the state secrets privilege, and the FISA Amendments Act to make clear that blanket surveillance of the Internet activity and phone records of any person residing in the U.S. is prohibited by law and that violations can be reviewed in adversarial proceedings before a public court;
2. Create a special committee to investigate, report, and reveal to the public the extent of this domestic spying. This committee should create specific recommendations for legaland regulatory reform to end unconstitutional surveillance;
3. Hold accountable those public officials who are found to be responsible for this unconstitutional surveillance.
Great points and clear explanation.
We (I) are not against the NSA spying as some people think. Thats their job and we need it because everyone spies. Espionage is a way of life for every country.
1. The constitution cannot be violated 2. Accountability
And to make myself clear, I don't like guns or ever used them but If need be I would also stand for the second amendment. I would stand for every amendment in the constitution for that matter.
If leaders think they can bend the rules here and there than we are no longer a nation that stands on the shoulders of giants that sacrificed their lives so YOU and I could stand here say what we want, do what we want. Remember all these people lived and they died forming this country from ashes:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
We (I) are not against the NSA spying as some people think. Thats their job and we need it because everyone spies. Espionage is a way of life for every country.
1. The constitution cannot be violated 2. Accountability
And to make myself clear, I don't like guns or ever used them but If need be I would also stand for the second amendment. I would stand for every amendment in the constitution for that matter.
If leaders think they can bend the rules here and there than we are no longer a nation that stands on the shoulders of giants that sacrificed their lives so YOU and I could stand here say what we want, do what we want. Remember all these people lived and they died forming this country from ashes:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
YES the NSA's mission is to spy. We are fine with that but NOT domestically. We are not fine with that.
In the borders of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA according to the 4th Amendment of te UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION domestic spying is not legal.
1: NSA should be subject to accountability like everyone in this country 2: All NSA activities should be restricted to foreign intelligence gathering.
This is the jist of it.
In the borders of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA according to the 4th Amendment of te UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION domestic spying is not legal.
1: NSA should be subject to accountability like everyone in this country 2: All NSA activities should be restricted to foreign intelligence gathering.
This is the jist of it.
Not all of us are "fine with that"; we've just agreed to focus primarily on the bits where we have the broader support.
So existence of organisation with particular goal is good enough reason to pursue that goal, no matter if its ethical or no?
Seriously Americans, what's wrong with you?
Seriously Americans, what's wrong with you?
It is absolutely colorblind to be calling out America specifically as 'unethical' because it spies on foreigners. Every government ever spies on foreigners - some just do it more than others. Hell, Germany just convicted a Russian spy couple not one week ago (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-23145426).
I'm not convinced the whole game is worth the effort, but I'm not going to pretend there isn't an actual need for government intelligence gathering. And there are quite a few of us who see a big distinction between targeted intelligence gathering and broad spectrum communications interception.
I'm not convinced the whole game is worth the effort, but I'm not going to pretend there isn't an actual need for government intelligence gathering. And there are quite a few of us who see a big distinction between targeted intelligence gathering and broad spectrum communications interception.
I think your comment was intended for me.
Their goal is protect the US. Do you think there are no threats within our borders? Seriously Americans, what's wrong with you?
See? We can all try to make each other look stupid if we want. It doesn't make your opinion correct. Show me how I will be negatively affected by the NSA continuing to do what they've always done. I assure you, I can be convinced if you're right and I'm wrong. I just can't see the down side.
Their goal is protect the US. Do you think there are no threats within our borders? Seriously Americans, what's wrong with you?
See? We can all try to make each other look stupid if we want. It doesn't make your opinion correct. Show me how I will be negatively affected by the NSA continuing to do what they've always done. I assure you, I can be convinced if you're right and I'm wrong. I just can't see the down side.
Secret services spying on each other is a sad reality, but till now all countries spied on each other spies/politicians/diplomats etc, not on regular people. When you work at embassy you know from the start thay you are under observation. It's like soldier going to a war for money - it was his choice. Spying on everybody is like killing civilians at war. It's worse.
Another analogy - putting everybody from a street in jail just in case. The fact that you can put criminals in jail and every country does this (and sometimes jail innocent people by error) doesn't make putting in jail EVERYBODY and releasing them when they prove they are innocent acceptable.
You may be not affected, but that doesn't make it any less evil. I am not affected by the lack of LGBT rights in Poland, but I still support them, cause it's stupid to revoke rights from people without reason.
Also allowing people to get so much power make it almost impossible to later revoke that power when they switch their goals or abuse it. Who can guarant you that nobody uses PRISM for personal benefit? Like people betting on stock exchange because they read that some company is going to default in private emails, and all other people on stock lose their money to these assholes? That's just the first example that came to my mind. Do you trust every person in NSA that they won't do such stuff? Or are you OK with it?
There is a point after which "to protect my country" is not good enough excuse to revoke people rights.
I have right to not trust officials from foreign country (that I have no way to vote out of office) with my secrets. They already are doing crazy stuff. Are you OK with what USA is doing to Snowden? Cause I'm not.
Another analogy - putting everybody from a street in jail just in case. The fact that you can put criminals in jail and every country does this (and sometimes jail innocent people by error) doesn't make putting in jail EVERYBODY and releasing them when they prove they are innocent acceptable.
You may be not affected, but that doesn't make it any less evil. I am not affected by the lack of LGBT rights in Poland, but I still support them, cause it's stupid to revoke rights from people without reason.
Also allowing people to get so much power make it almost impossible to later revoke that power when they switch their goals or abuse it. Who can guarant you that nobody uses PRISM for personal benefit? Like people betting on stock exchange because they read that some company is going to default in private emails, and all other people on stock lose their money to these assholes? That's just the first example that came to my mind. Do you trust every person in NSA that they won't do such stuff? Or are you OK with it?
There is a point after which "to protect my country" is not good enough excuse to revoke people rights.
I have right to not trust officials from foreign country (that I have no way to vote out of office) with my secrets. They already are doing crazy stuff. Are you OK with what USA is doing to Snowden? Cause I'm not.
> Also allowing people to get so much power make it almost impossible to later revoke that power when they switch their goals or abuse it. Who can guarant you that nobody uses PRISM for personal benefit? Like people betting on stock exchange because they read that some company is going to default in private emails, and all other people on stock lose their money to these assholes? That's just the first example that came to my mind. Do you trust every person in NSA that they won't do such stuff? Or are you OK with it?
I agree with this statement,
I would like to add: That this nation was built on a very powerful constitution. What makes America different than most nations is that the Constitution amendments are like Axioms. Unlike many places these rules cannot be changed, shifted or broken. Yes I am saying that the US constitution is stronger than any other constitution out there today.
The forefathers lived in a very different age but were bright people. Technology changes, times change but human nature and instinct does not. If we do not stand for the constitution and what it means you will be accepting a different reality and a different America. We will die time will continue but to ensure that America is what it was intended to be we must show our presence today and protect the basic civil rights of Americans.
>Their goal is protect the US. Do you think there are no threats within our borders? Seriously Americans, what's wrong with you?
There were always threats within our borders. Thats why we have the DEA, FBI, ATF, Homeland Sec., etc.
Billions of dollars of data and wire tapping is not going to protect you. A person with will an intent to do evil will and can do it no matter what.
However, if the solution is to give up our civil liberties which makes this country the best place on earth in panic, distrust and spying on our own people; then we have already lost and they (evil) have won.
I agree with this statement,
I would like to add: That this nation was built on a very powerful constitution. What makes America different than most nations is that the Constitution amendments are like Axioms. Unlike many places these rules cannot be changed, shifted or broken. Yes I am saying that the US constitution is stronger than any other constitution out there today.
The forefathers lived in a very different age but were bright people. Technology changes, times change but human nature and instinct does not. If we do not stand for the constitution and what it means you will be accepting a different reality and a different America. We will die time will continue but to ensure that America is what it was intended to be we must show our presence today and protect the basic civil rights of Americans.
>Their goal is protect the US. Do you think there are no threats within our borders? Seriously Americans, what's wrong with you?
There were always threats within our borders. Thats why we have the DEA, FBI, ATF, Homeland Sec., etc.
Billions of dollars of data and wire tapping is not going to protect you. A person with will an intent to do evil will and can do it no matter what.
However, if the solution is to give up our civil liberties which makes this country the best place on earth in panic, distrust and spying on our own people; then we have already lost and they (evil) have won.
One, I don't think the NSA isn't allowed to spy domestically. The NSA is charged with collecting foreign and counter intelligence in an effort to protect the interests of the US. If there is an intelligence need which requires domestic collection methods, you better believe they are allowed, by law, to collect.
Even if they weren't allowed to spy domestically, I'm not convinced that would be an appropriate limitation on the NSA. They are the best at this type of intelligence collection. As long as the US has enemies within it's own borders, tying the hands of people who can help us is going to be a pretty bad idea.
Even if they weren't allowed to spy domestically, I'm not convinced that would be an appropriate limitation on the NSA. They are the best at this type of intelligence collection. As long as the US has enemies within it's own borders, tying the hands of people who can help us is going to be a pretty bad idea.
> As long as the US has enemies within it's own borders, tying the hands of people who can help us is going to be a pretty bad idea.
You are aware that this sentence sounds like from worst communist propaganda from stalinist period?
You are aware that this sentence sounds like from worst communist propaganda from stalinist period?
> As long as the US has enemies within it's own borders, tying the hands of people who can help us is going to be a pretty bad idea.
A constant state of fear, always at war, our enemies are about to attack us.
Isn't this what North Korea fuels the fire with?
I will be protesting and the point is that a multibillion dollar infringement of the constitution is not whats going to stop domestic "enemies". Its stemming hate and spreading peace that will ultimately matter. If someone is willing to attack you, if they are smart, and if they have nothing to loose and are willing to die for it then NOTHING, NOTHING can stop them. Not even Minority Report.
We whom will protest will protest because there are other ways to attain these goals, without breaking the constitution.
A constant state of fear, always at war, our enemies are about to attack us.
Isn't this what North Korea fuels the fire with?
I will be protesting and the point is that a multibillion dollar infringement of the constitution is not whats going to stop domestic "enemies". Its stemming hate and spreading peace that will ultimately matter. If someone is willing to attack you, if they are smart, and if they have nothing to loose and are willing to die for it then NOTHING, NOTHING can stop them. Not even Minority Report.
We whom will protest will protest because there are other ways to attain these goals, without breaking the constitution.
> A constant state of fear, always at war, our enemies are about to attack us. Isn't this what North Korea fuels the fire with?
If you think a country this size could ever reach the point of having no enemies, you are delusional. We will never be close to this condition. Spreading peace sounds great. In fact, I fully believe that the highest calling of mankind is to respect and care for others. I don't want hate and fear. But I'm also not delusional. We are a highly targeted country. We have enemies and will continue to have them inside and outside of our borders. Recognizing that does not make me or any other rational person a fear monger. Not recognizing it makes you appear naive.
If you think a country this size could ever reach the point of having no enemies, you are delusional. We will never be close to this condition. Spreading peace sounds great. In fact, I fully believe that the highest calling of mankind is to respect and care for others. I don't want hate and fear. But I'm also not delusional. We are a highly targeted country. We have enemies and will continue to have them inside and outside of our borders. Recognizing that does not make me or any other rational person a fear monger. Not recognizing it makes you appear naive.
The point isn't that there are no enemies. The point is that the cure is worse than the sickness.
Anyway, what are you worrying about? Another 9/11? Car accidents are more probable causes of death, and you could eliminate most of them cheaper and with no ethical issues, boosting economy as a byproduct (build fast railroads, subsidize the tickets). Gun ownership is another low hanging fruit. Hell, even just making flying cheaper and more accessible will probably save more lives than NSA.
Anyway, what are you worrying about? Another 9/11? Car accidents are more probable causes of death, and you could eliminate most of them cheaper and with no ethical issues, boosting economy as a byproduct (build fast railroads, subsidize the tickets). Gun ownership is another low hanging fruit. Hell, even just making flying cheaper and more accessible will probably save more lives than NSA.
> Anyway, what are you worrying about? Another 9/11?
Yes. Of course. I want NSA to keep horrible things like that from happening.
Yes. There are other ways to die than terrorist attacks. They're also bad? I'm really not sure where you're going with this.
I haven't been noticeably affected by the NSA collecting data on me. I can't think of many ways in which I would be affected. I would probably be affected if I were interested in doing something illegal and needed to communicate with someone about it. I'm ok with that reality.
Seriously, someone chime in if you've been negatively affected by the NSA collecting coms data on you. Everyone acts like its the end of the world but it all seems like hype to me. Just another way to get traffic to a news site. One thing I haven't heard is how it's affecting people. People didn't even know it was happening til some guy decided to tell them. If something can go unnoticed for this long, how horrible could it be? Everyone's just creeped out by it and I guess I don't care.
Yes. Of course. I want NSA to keep horrible things like that from happening.
Yes. There are other ways to die than terrorist attacks. They're also bad? I'm really not sure where you're going with this.
I haven't been noticeably affected by the NSA collecting data on me. I can't think of many ways in which I would be affected. I would probably be affected if I were interested in doing something illegal and needed to communicate with someone about it. I'm ok with that reality.
Seriously, someone chime in if you've been negatively affected by the NSA collecting coms data on you. Everyone acts like its the end of the world but it all seems like hype to me. Just another way to get traffic to a news site. One thing I haven't heard is how it's affecting people. People didn't even know it was happening til some guy decided to tell them. If something can go unnoticed for this long, how horrible could it be? Everyone's just creeped out by it and I guess I don't care.
I have a hard time taking Mozilla serious in this case.
If Mozilla where really against the NSA spying they would all their users to easily remove any Google ( and other third party ) services from Firefox. I understand why they won't, it would mean taking a financial hit, if I understand they business model.
It's not that it is "Googles fault", they are force to work with the NSA. However having services from a company known to work with the NSA so deeply embedded into your product weakness the impact of your resistance to the NSA surveillance program.
If Mozilla where really against the NSA spying they would all their users to easily remove any Google ( and other third party ) services from Firefox. I understand why they won't, it would mean taking a financial hit, if I understand they business model.
It's not that it is "Googles fault", they are force to work with the NSA. However having services from a company known to work with the NSA so deeply embedded into your product weakness the impact of your resistance to the NSA surveillance program.
Mozilla can do more good taking Google's money and using it to fund decentralization and anti-surveillance features. They have enough market share and clout to bring things to the mass market.
I would most like to see them champion putting in a DHT service in Firefox, where decentralized networks can be "registered". The user just needs to confirm that they want their browser to function as a regular node or supernode for service X, Y and Z and they are now serving information for networks X, Y and Z everywhere. A generic DHT running everywhere that any network requiring decentralized discover can be used for a Skype-like WebRTC directory, torrents decentralization, DNS alternative, etc.
I would most like to see them champion putting in a DHT service in Firefox, where decentralized networks can be "registered". The user just needs to confirm that they want their browser to function as a regular node or supernode for service X, Y and Z and they are now serving information for networks X, Y and Z everywhere. A generic DHT running everywhere that any network requiring decentralized discover can be used for a Skype-like WebRTC directory, torrents decentralization, DNS alternative, etc.
I do not see how they have made it difficult to remove Google. One setting in about:config does the trick.
I think there where 5 or 6 places Google appeared last time I checked. Also about:config isn't really user friendly.
Useful info for street protests:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5984651
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5984651
Great idea in the comments about switching your phone to airplane mode.
This is not necessary. There are numerous cameras in all public spaces. Better to leave phone on for communications. Better yet, install live stream or ustream:
http://www.ustream.tv/new
http://new.livestream.com/
http://www.ustream.tv/new
http://new.livestream.com/
Exactly how effective will an online protest be on a day that so many people spend outdoors; away from their computers/devices?
Exactly how effective will an offline protest be on a day that so many people will spend online, still using their computers and devices?
http://www.restorethefourth.net/
Do not assume one precludes the other.
http://www.restorethefourth.net/
Do not assume one precludes the other.
There is only one way to find out..
As a non-american I wonder if Mozilla and others are against all spying of NSA or just Spying of American citizens.
I'm surprised Wikipedia isn't participating in at least putting a call to action to call your representatives like they did with SOPA last time. I'm not surprised Google isn't doing it, because I expected as much from them this time around, but I'm disappointed. It seems they only participate in these actions when there's immediate gain for them (like not passing SOPA, or ITU's "sender pays" policy). I just hope they realize that we might not be "available" to help them next time they need the public's support for something.
I'm not. If you go the the site (CallForFreedom.org) that is the rallying point you get:
"America has violated its founding principles. The Constitution says government can't spy on us-- not without suspicion. But now, thousands of government employees at the NSA and other agencies track our phones and read our emails. The government is dangerously trespassing on our rights. How can free speech, free association, or a free press survive when everyone is always being watched, even in their most private moments?"
Wikipedia etc. would probably only get behind something that was not limited to providing a benefit to US citizens alone. SOPA mattered to Wikipedia because it would have affected their ability to provide the service they provide globally.
"America has violated its founding principles. The Constitution says government can't spy on us-- not without suspicion. But now, thousands of government employees at the NSA and other agencies track our phones and read our emails. The government is dangerously trespassing on our rights. How can free speech, free association, or a free press survive when everyone is always being watched, even in their most private moments?"
Wikipedia etc. would probably only get behind something that was not limited to providing a benefit to US citizens alone. SOPA mattered to Wikipedia because it would have affected their ability to provide the service they provide globally.
Wikipedia has to pass a fine line of trying not to involve itself in politics, unless it's a clear threat to it's ability to it's job, and it's not clear that surveillance (even on such a broad scale) prevents it building an encyclopaedia.
Wikipedia could argue that people will self-censor themselves and thus avoid looking up information on Wikipedia related to illnesses, sexual topics and so on. Its the same argument libraries has when claiming peoples library card history is protected.
And whappens when those who used to write the articles for anything start censoring themselves too.
The surveillance state has struck them with fear.
After reading the article, I am slightly disappointed. This is about banners on homepages, not people carrying signs through the streets. Please don't underestimate what actual protest in the streets can do, especially if it appears in unexpected places or in unexpected social circles.
And don't think that there is no precedent for street protests against internet policies either. Remember that the turning point for ACTA was the moment when the people of Poland took it to the streets. [1]
[1] http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&js=n&prev=...
And don't think that there is no precedent for street protests against internet policies either. Remember that the turning point for ACTA was the moment when the people of Poland took it to the streets. [1]
[1] http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&js=n&prev=...
http://www.restorethefourth.net/
There will be protests on the 4th of July as well in many US cities. Maybe other countries will protest in solidarity as well, like in the occupy protests, but we won't be sure what happens until the 5th of July.
There will be protests on the 4th of July as well in many US cities. Maybe other countries will protest in solidarity as well, like in the occupy protests, but we won't be sure what happens until the 5th of July.
All the links on that site 404 for me. Where can I get details on the San Francisco protest?
They're in the process of updating the site, so the links will be fixed in the next hour or so. https://www.facebook.com/events/553989834652790/
Protest in every venue you have available.
Don't underestimate what media exposure can do.
With ACTA, Europeans were already warm because of SOPA / the Internet blackout - and because the blackout was a big thing that impacted regular people, it was all over the news, yes in Europe.
With ACTA, Europeans were already warm because of SOPA / the Internet blackout - and because the blackout was a big thing that impacted regular people, it was all over the news, yes in Europe.
Is everyone unaware that the NSA's mission is to collect digital intelligence through clandestine means? It's right on their website. Their mission is to spy on people and has been for decades.
I may be unaware of what people are really upset about. I just can't understand how people are so up in arms by this. I'm legitimately interested in how I'm affected by this as a person who doesn't conduct activity online that the NSA would ever care about. Can someone help me out here?