People buy smaller and smaller denominations of Bitcoin then.
Which means earlier you invest more your Bitcoin is worth.
Until someone realizes that who ever was rich before is now loosing valur by investing in BTC too late and making early adopters rich.
The question is only when this ruse gets so outbalanced that no one wants to invest anymore which will either lead to inflation or the big crypto burn.
Imagine Microblades: standard Android phone form factor slide in servers.
Building a home lab k8s cluster by buying something similar to a phone.you could go to a website say if you want a display or not, how much storage and than you have a flat server you just slide into your case.
Then a few years later you buy a stronger one and replace it while the old one is used by someone else.
Like how a Nas manages your disks, k8s could manage your Microblades.
Cheap ha with Autoupgrade capabilities.
I could also start using the outdated Microblades for offshoring when I keep them running at my parents place.
The enclosed could also provide networking and perhaps a 13" slide out display with a display selector.
Wikipedias definition of inflation sounds exactly like op said and what I assume as well:
'In economics, inflation is a general increase in the prices of goods and services in an economy. When the general price level rises, each unit of currency buys fewer goods and services; consequently, inflation corresponds to a reduction in the purchasing power of money.'
I can afford less for the same unit of currency (Bitcoin) therefore I have inflation or deflation if I get more.
And people claim that Bitcoin is inflation save due to a limit amount of bitcoins being produced (I read that multiple times) while this is just not true.
But apparently when you are grafana everything looks like a dashboard UI?
Joke aside I will have a look but I didn't like the screenshots before already. I like the dashboardy thing for dashboards but otherwise it's not a really good UI system for everything else.
So instead of testing your companies CICD pipeline, contributing to it and making it overall better for everyone you now have a snow flake system only you use and know how to maintain?
I try to align when possible. I think your solution is hacky and costs the company much more in the long run.
It's not. The big plane fly area at airports.is a hard area to life in due to all the noise.
But small air taxies would first of fly much lower, always in the city and if it is cheap enough for all of us, you need more than just one.
And if it's not affordable for us, than there is no real reason for us to accept this at all.
And yes the big planes when they travel very high you can not hear them but it's also totally valid to have the discussion about air pollution and sky visual pollution.
But air transport for goods is actually something were we all benefit. Airmail as well.
If population density is not high than it will not be cost efficient for the normal people.im surprised how many people here think that rich people who can afford to fly over a mountain regularly is a good thing.
Perhaps in 20-50 years when we solved climate change.
Those companies are not trying to just create a cheap and easy to use carplane they want to become rich which needs business viability.
And I don't mind if they solve some niche problems. I mind that they want to fly over my head every 10 minutes.
Which means earlier you invest more your Bitcoin is worth.
Until someone realizes that who ever was rich before is now loosing valur by investing in BTC too late and making early adopters rich.
The question is only when this ruse gets so outbalanced that no one wants to invest anymore which will either lead to inflation or the big crypto burn.