I don't think automakers ever thought drivers LIKED touch screens, it was just so much cheaper that someone saw the margins and decided to go for it.
When we design synthesizers, the MAJORITY of the cost is in the UI. People need the UI because our industry is all about gestures and mastery. You cannot master when you have a large screen that is not consistent and requires too much interaction.
Musicians would call this a feeling of 'menu-diving' which is almost the worst thing you can say to describe a synth.
There are actually some technological advances here where you can create buttons in a touch screen (convex or concave) which does help with some of the issues here, but it isn't cheap enough to be an alternative yet. I need to find the links for those
Companies need to acknowledge the flow of information is limited. We are in a period of humanity where people CANNOT know all the little details. You don't get to create a system and not take responsibility for the problems it causes using law as a safety net and expect it to scale. That is morally wrong
Yes people have a responsibility to learn more, but the company has a responsibility to protect the people it interacts with
When we design synthesizers, the MAJORITY of the cost is in the UI. People need the UI because our industry is all about gestures and mastery. You cannot master when you have a large screen that is not consistent and requires too much interaction.
Musicians would call this a feeling of 'menu-diving' which is almost the worst thing you can say to describe a synth.
There are actually some technological advances here where you can create buttons in a touch screen (convex or concave) which does help with some of the issues here, but it isn't cheap enough to be an alternative yet. I need to find the links for those