Not at all. You design and iterate on the button using the individual classes, then you swap them out for a concise class once you are done. It's how tailwind is designed to be used.
Agreed. My team is doing this very process. If we run into not knowing what class to use, we just look it up on the docs. VSCode also has a great intellisense plugin for tailwind as well (https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=bradlc.v...). For the first day or two we used the docs pretty heavily. Now, we just make a best guess, intellisense generally tells us what the class name actually is, and if we can't figure it out then we go to the docs.
I use tailwind with Angular, and we solve this with using [ngClass] to add/remove the class. You could do something similar with plain JS as well, and I imagine in most frameworks. Although yes, that is annoying to have to deal with.
Even then, I would still recommend using the postcss extend tag. Much easier to read that way. Also, postcss doesn't require any frameworks, you can still do everything with plain ol' html and javascript.
postcss is literally how tailwind works. If you are using tailwind, you already have postcss. I get it, you don't like modern frameworks. Don't use it.
>This works okay in extremely componentized web apps. It's a nightmare if your UI isn't highly componentized. I've seen projects where you make a button by copy pasting this ~80 character string of tailwind classes all over the place, and then changing the color names if you need to. Good luck fixing that when the designer decides that we don't want any buttons to have rounded corners anymore.
That app is done wrong. If you are using the same styles to represent a button you should use postcss and do
>If you count someone else's server as "serverless"
That's literally what serverless is. Serverless doesn't mean there are no servers. It is simply the ability to run your code without having to think about the server it is running on. More server agnostic than serverless.
>I assume "Taiwan region" is simply something to satisfy the PRC gov't (CCP) which believes Taiwan is a part of its country and governed by PRC.
To be fair, Taiwan (Officially the Republic of China) also claims that it is a part of China and is in fact the rightful rulers of China. The Kuomintang withdrew to Taiwan after losing control of mainland China to Mao and the Communists. I'm not super up to date on the latest claims between China and Taiwan, but Taiwan has never recognized officially that they do not rightfully control China.
Every hiring manager is different. Some have some bullshit "requires 3 years in this stack" kind of requirements. Personally I feel like the important thing is knowing how to program period. I think knowing paradigms is what's more important than stacks. Id take someone who knows how to build a oop backend with a spa front end for my position I'm hiring for even if they don't have specifically .net/angular experience. You can always ramp up on the specifics while learning paradigms can be much harder.
>But they don't reject the "kill all men" people. That is just a harmless joke apparently.
Because it is a joke. Remember when women started killing men in mass numbers? Oh wait no, that isn't a thing. But we can absolutely point to countless times that men have killed and harmed women.
>Feminism goes out of their way to cancel male spaces while building up female spaces. Video games made by men for men? Bad, needs to include women!
Oh yes, I totally remember the Feminist Jihad of 2016 when women rose up and destroyed Video Games forever!
Do you think that having diversity in video games, both in the creation and consumption of it is somehow destroying video games? If so that is your own sexism talking.
>as if they let men make their own spaces...
Men are free to make their own spaces. They do it all the time actually.
>Feminism also started shaming men who complain about women. Women are still allowed to complain freely about men. Don't they understand how damaging this is for men's mental health that they aren't allowed to let out steam while women are free to do so?
I can still complain about women. So can you. Feminists haven't stopped that. Unless by complain and let out steam about women you mean being misogynistic, then yeah that's your own sexism talking.
>If I bring up male issues as I did here, feminists will come and say things like "Are you so weak that you need to complain and let out steam just to manage your day? Grow up!", or "Why do you need your own space, can't you handle women around you? Don't be a child, just learn how to socialize and all your issues are solved!".
Emphasis on "how you did here" because what you are doing is creating straw men and being sexist. However men are free to talk about male issues. https://old.reddit.com/r/MensLib
Also, feminists aren't saying the shit you claim they are saying about men there. Not all women are feminists. Especially since you are claiming that
>But instead they just say that men have to be stoic or they aren't welcome in feminist society. And I bet this post will get such toxic masculinity responses from feminists who argue that men just have to be more stoic and everything will be fine.
Because feminists do not want men to be Stoics. They literally want men to talk about their issues, their emotions, and their wants and desires. The opposite of stoicism.
>But feminists says men should cry more!", they say that, but they don't mean it. If a man cries such that it inconveniences a woman, guess what? It is the man who is bad. The woman complaining about the main crying is obviously correct, the man should have been stronger, but now he is so weak that it burdens the woman and that is bad. "But you can't expect a person to handle too much emotional labor!", well, the thing is, I've never seen a situation where a woman complained about a man crying and feminists didn't took her side.
Again, I question if you've ever actually talked to a feminist before. I cry in front of my wife all the time. Feminists do not want men to be strong to the point of not wanting them to have emotions. That's not what feminism is about, at all. That's a prime example of internalized patriarchy on the part of the woman. You seem to think that feminist === woman. That is not at all the case.
Hit me up when women and trans people start oppressing cis men. Until then, "play mad-libs" doesn't really hold up any water. There is this thing called history, and it backs the above person's comment.
My startup is a bit different, because we actually have a BI team that offers custom BI dashboards for our clients. We use PowerBI Premium to embed our BI dashboards into our web application.