Faulty basis on statistics. Say there's a restaurant and working there are Lisa and Bob, Bob makes 50 cents an hour more than Lisa makes. Both are restaurant workers, but the man gets more money, so it's illegal.
Where that analogy cripples is "restaurant worker", Bob is a cook, Lisa is a server, not the exact same job thus legal. Your statistics rank by general categories of work.
Your statistics are flawed. Any plausible proof you have of men making more than women, report it to the police or your lawyer.
Somewhere in late 2014 there was a thread on the /int/ board joking about how moot was apparently having a relationship with a known "SJW" as they call it. Coincidentally, /pol/, the most ass annihilating board for politically correct types was ruined after the relationship leak, chaptas were removed and keywords were replaced with the political opposites.
After this, the /v/ board started calling moot a "cuckold", to elaborate, cuck has been a meme for the last few months on /v/ due to the huge rise of affairs and relationship problems in SGDQ 2014. Moot was ridiculed based on speculation from /int/, but most of all for ruining a controversial board dedicated to news and politics.
GG was never banned on 4chan, GG threads were deleted on /v/ since it was considered spam, the GG threads continued to strive on /vg/, the "video game general" board.
In the end Moot restored /pol/ after harassment from 4channers, which may be the reason moot is retiring.
Where that analogy cripples is "restaurant worker", Bob is a cook, Lisa is a server, not the exact same job thus legal. Your statistics rank by general categories of work.
Your statistics are flawed. Any plausible proof you have of men making more than women, report it to the police or your lawyer.