I'm on mobile and didn't watch the video, but a commercial airliner travels something like 500mph, 8 lbs of drone is pretty damaging at that speed. I know they take significant precautions against eg birds.
Don't endangered species contribute some portion of new pharmaceuticals each year? Didn't we just finish unraveling the complex dynamics of a bee's flight, which our previous models couldn't explain?
My impression was always that the study of ecology and such is a big driver for technology, and by extension the economy and quality of life.
education is still really valuable, if one chooses the right field.
Employment rates and salaries for geologists, metallurgical engineers, pharmacists, one can go from poverty to well off in the span of a single generation with the right college degree.
That isn't to say there is no problem. I doubt that history will look at this disparity kindly. Perhaps better education about education, and what options and powers are available to us in general, would be wise.
mars and venus are the first step. we aren't going to jump out of the solar system on our first try. we will be lucky if we don't have a lot of failures in that endeavor, even after the experience and materials we gain from the solar system.
>Moreover if death is natural process
humans are also a natural process.
>some alternative star may born by that time.
you mean a new star is going to come to our solar system before the sun dies? I think I must be misunderstanding. If not, that's asinine.
I don't really get how you can call it fearmongering. who is supposed to be afraid? most people only think as far ahead as two generations. the only people who are disturbed by your strange brand of environmentalism are people who think hundreds of years into the future, ie other environmentalists.
your billions figure is also a gross overestimate. our timeline is not so generous.
and don't forget that life took (actually) billions of years to evolve. what are you trying to protect on mars and venus that is more important than that?
there isn't any reason to suspect that a small company doing one thing better will walk all over AAA, that's hyperbole. AAA's culture is good enough and their other large advantages give them their market share.
Is it hysteria to suggest that what men in a male dominated field think is appropriate might have statistical significance in the representation of women?
it is that he found it an appropriate shirt to wear.
as an extreme comparison, if it was a woman dominated field and they commonly wore shirts depicting scantily clad men with bulging pants, I think it would impact my desire to enter that field.
I don't know that the parents can be blamed so readily. Here in Los Angeles at least, I've been very dissaspointed with what my classmates consider appropriate.
I know that sometimes, images are first sent in black and white to save on data, color is sent later.
Hubble apparently only does black and white. color images can be obtained using a technique involving two of its black and white images. But that is a telescope, probably not similar.