HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

PresentHarmony

no profile record

comments

PresentHarmony
·4 lata temu·discuss
One more question, if you don't mind. 1 image is generated in 0.7 seconds (25 steps ) and the same single image with 50 steps will be generated in 1.3 seconds. So it's much cheaper to generate more images for the same promt. Am I right or am I missing something ? Thanks in advance for your answer.

P.S. Though it should be 1.4 seconds. 0.7*2=14.If you think twice the speps, twice the time.
PresentHarmony
·4 lata temu·discuss
Thank you indeed, my friend!
PresentHarmony
·4 lata temu·discuss
Do I get it right, it takes 0.55 second or 0.49 second to generate an image depending on the batch?

Thank you so much for your post! I would be very grateful for the response!
PresentHarmony
·4 lata temu·discuss
Or if you count in another way. In one second, how many pictures it will be able to generate, with these parameters. It could be 1.05, 1.1, or say 1.5 or even 2 pictures. Thank you very much for your post! I will be very grateful for the answer!
PresentHarmony
·4 lata temu·discuss
Can you please eloborate, how many milliseconds does it take to generate 1 image with these wonderful improvements? I will be very grateful for your answer! Thank you very much!