I think a better idea would be have it change the password/wipe data in the event that you do not log in within X amount of time (Think Lost). Keep your mouth shut for X time and there is nothing you can do to help them.
Speaking out my ass (IANAL) this is a deadman meant to protect against any attacker not necessarily law enforcement, this might be enough to keep you away from destruction of evidence charges.
It's ridiculous to think of the DPRK as a threat at it's current level but allowing such an antagonistic state to research ICBMs is a long-term threat. Personally I would rather us a take them down now then let them fall apart in 50 years when they have the capability to nuke Seoul.
The problem is in the complexity of the problems solved at a University and a k-12 level. I think this is brilliant but it assumes that there is varied work to be accomplished by all members. Most of my projects in HS where all easy enough that it was difficult to say that more then one person was needed. Slackers could survive off their friends and the people who would get everything done on their own and then let the rest of the group copy.
Interestingly enough this is the reason why planes really arn't safe security wise.
Just about every other industry has to worry about Compsec researchers busting in and screaming that the end is nigh. But not airplanes. You even try touching one of them and you will be in for quite a ride through the joys of bureaucracy.
It's the basis of QA, your customers will use your product in ways you never intended. It could go on to say that through your customers misuse of the product you will be able to make your product better.
But with planes, the intended use gets so much more critical and the number of people who test it gets incredibly low. If these systems aren't tested, errors wont be found. And one day someone is going to hook up to a plane and try to bring it down. And it is because of this lack of use outside of intention that an attacker will be successful.
Obviously, I never want to be on a plane next to a security researcher plugged into the aircraft, but I think the secrecy around aircraft is their biggest vulnerability. A solution that would work somewhat counter intuitively would be parking a plane at LAS this summer for all the Black Hat and DEF CON attendees to play with. The resulting publications would without a doubt revolutionize aircraft security.
Like what? Make people pay for content? The internet costs money to maintain and I'm sorry to say but much of the convenience we enjoy is provided only because we look at a thousand+ ads a day. Do you really want to pay $5 a month for every site you want to read?
With the money that a programmer makes in the current market 150 a month is nothing more then beer money. The blog serves its purpose by acting as an advertisement for yourself, putting advertisements within an advertisement is a bit redundant. That one guy that gets turned away from the ads may be the guy willing to pay you made money.
Isn't the burden of proof on the police to prove that you are lying? So if neither side has proof it must be assumed that you did indeed just happen to lose it.
And that's the fatal flaw of Reddit. The more people it attracts the worse the content becomes. /r/iama used to be really good, but it has turned into a vapid wasteland of PR departments.
Speaking out my ass (IANAL) this is a deadman meant to protect against any attacker not necessarily law enforcement, this might be enough to keep you away from destruction of evidence charges.