HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

acveilleux

no profile record

comments

acveilleux
·10 lat temu·discuss
Apache did the same thing in 1.3.xx (I'm not familiar with the 2.x codebase, it was not popular in 2000). You had a per-request pool to allocate from and once the request was done, the whole pool was free()'d. It was my first encounter with that strategy and it's always struck me as the sanest way to go for a long-lived process with C's memory model.
acveilleux
·10 lat temu·discuss
The independence of microservice is not always achieved. You often end up with a mess of interrelated services depending on fairly narrow version ranges to retain compatibility. The more homogeneous your production environment is, the less that's a problem. The worst case is when you have a dozen (or hundreds...) of production clusters that are all independent and not necessarily in-synch as far as deployed version goes.
acveilleux
·10 lat temu·discuss
The methods I am familiar with, mostly dealing with volumetric measurements, registration, and automated segmentation were either robust or had well characterized limitations.

I take some offense to blanketing the entire field of MRI based on a couple articles pointing out that some (admittedly a lot) fMRI experiments are statistically unsound.
acveilleux
·10 lat temu·discuss
Back when I was involved in MRI research, multiple comparisons correction was the rock that many a paper in the field crashed upon. Neuro psych. suffers from weak stats, which is a far cry from saying either fMRI itself is meaningless or saying MRI as a whole is.
acveilleux
·10 lat temu·discuss
That's actually the same article on two sites. Itself just a layman's piece on an actual article in Nature Neuroscience.
acveilleux
·10 lat temu·discuss
There's a fair bit of junky data and quite a few analysis methods that cannot compare data accurately between magnets, position wrt isocentre, or even processing software revisions. But your claim is a lot bolder than that.
acveilleux
·10 lat temu·discuss
fMRI papers tend to be written by neuro-psychologists or similar folks. Not engineers, statisticians, or physicists. They get reviewed by them too.
acveilleux
·10 lat temu·discuss
They are but 3dClustSim (the culprit) is essentially used only for fMRI.