This really isn't an argument. It's just saying that because someone has been killed we shouldn't be able to have rational discussion because our logic is "twisted".
I think that part of this trend may be tied to games, such as PUBG, becoming popular while still "under development". I imagine once a game has a stable server build it is much more practical to distribute that server to all of the community operators and have them update on a fixed / infrequent schedule. Whereas, while changes are still being constantly made to the server application, this would probably result in users only being able to connect to a small fraction of available community servers while waiting for the other servers to update.
It could also be that differences in academic performance (I'm assuming academic is the performance you were referring to in your comment) are not accurate metrics for identifying the effects of differential brain organization.
In scenarios like that, it's also difficult to control for the impact of different level of support for students in academic matters. For example, focused support for under-performing students compared to relatively relaxed support for students meeting expectations.
I could probably also see the impact of different psychological factors associated with being adopted by a family on a different continent being hard to control for.
Interestingly, for the items you listed, I am skeptical that needing to jump through the hoops of NLP would result in a more convenient experience for some users.
It feels like the reason why some of these voice systems actually have utility is because they are usable in scenarios where you typically can't/don't want to type (such as while driving, lying on the couch at your house, etc). When you require somebody to type in their query, I'm struggling to see why an Alexa/AI chat thread would perform better than just a search engine with AI features. Or how, practically, it's different than just a "thread" where what you type goes to a search engine.
Unrelated to what "side" of the "war" people making statements are on, I would think that the typical role of the HR department would be to examine the context surrounding inappropriate statements at work before taking action.
If the HR department doesn't operate that way, or the company guidelines suggest that some statements demand reprimand regardless of context, then I would suggest the issue would be surrounding the way the HR department operates rather than the people making complaints to HR.
I think the difference in perception, as compared to running a marathon, is that parenting is more an equivalent of entering a marathon where you have no option to stop, regardless of circumstances, and your performance has a massive impact on the life of another person.
If that were the way marathons worked, I think the reaction of the audience to someone's struggle to finish the race would be different.