HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

anon_shill

no profile record

comments

anon_shill
·12 dni temu·discuss
After years off of it I got back on it because living in NYC it’s a lot easier to find and get invited to events in the arts if you’re on it. I wish it weren’t so. I hate every part of it that isn’t a utility.
anon_shill
·23 dni temu·discuss
Does that apply to quotes from an article? They seemed to be criticizing a second or third degree source for being PR, which feels fair.
anon_shill
·26 dni temu·discuss
Here is what the National Science Foundation has to say about it:

> "The decision to de-scope aligns with NSF's wider strategy of a nimbler approach to prioritize support for evolving scientific priorities and emerging technologies, as well as smart life cycle management within its research infrastructure portfolio."

Seems like even if we want to understand the justifications, the people making these decisions don't care to share them with us.
anon_shill
·26 dni temu·discuss
Is this from Bannon and co.? What is their rationale for being militaristic during a return of Jesus? Wouldn't Jesus not like that very much?
anon_shill
·2 miesiące temu·discuss
> Ask it if a microservices architecture makes sense for your three-person team and it’ll explain why microservices are an excellent choice.

Just tried this. Claude Opus replied “probably not” and recommended a well structured monolith.
anon_shill
·3 miesiące temu·discuss
For what it’s worth, Persona claims to not work or interact with Thiel.

https://vmfunc.re/blog/persona-2
anon_shill
·4 miesiące temu·discuss
Did you read it? It does neither of those things. It establishes that Meta is fighting to amend these regulatory bills to push onus onto operating systems and Discord isn’t named once in the OP.
anon_shill
·4 miesiące temu·discuss
Ehh. In the last corporate PR nightmare I was witness to internally we absolutely tracked return subscribers in our fallout dashboard.
anon_shill
·5 miesięcy temu·discuss
Yep, it is easy to circumvent, and the silver lining of all of this is that regulators don't care. They care that these companies made an effort in guessing.
anon_shill
·5 miesięcy temu·discuss
From the second paragraph:

> And the only way to prove that you checked is to keep the data indefinitely.

This is not true and made me immediately stop reading. If a social media app uses a third party vendor to do facial/ID age estimation, the vendor can (and in many cases does) only send an estimated age range back to the caller. Some of the more privacy invasive KYC vendors like Persona persist and optionally pass back entire government IDs, but there are other age verifiers (k-ID, PRIVO, among others) who don't. Regulators are happy with apps using these less invasive ones and making a best effort based on an estimated age, and that doesn't require storing any additional PII. We really need to deconflate age verification from KYC to have productive conversations about this stuff. You can do one thing without doing the other.
anon_shill
·6 miesięcy temu·discuss
From the article

> Palantir is working on a tool for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) that populates a map with potential deportation targets, brings up a dossier on each person, and provides a “confidence score” on the person’s current address, 404 Media has learned. ICE is using it to find locations where lots of people it might detain could be based.

Is ICE using a general purpose app for surveillance or is Palantir making a deportation-centric app for ICE?