HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

bennysaurus

no profile record

comments

bennysaurus
·4 miesiące temu·discuss
Likely the emarker chip in the cable is reporting higher power capabilities than the cable can support long term. It'll work initially but then can't maintain that after resistance in the wires increase with wear.
bennysaurus
·8 miesięcy temu·discuss
Only a single maintainer for years, and it's fallen now to best-effort.
bennysaurus
·2 lata temu·discuss
A high voltage DC line is being built to Singapore now from a solar generator in Northern Australia, so it's definitely doable to send over that distance (around 3,000mi).

I would like to see more storage though in its various forms; the oversupply is during peak daytime hours, however there's still large draw at night that could be offset.
bennysaurus
·3 lata temu·discuss
You're right it is workload dependent. If you're low write but read heavy, you won't see huge differences in performance between RR and Serializable, so it can make sense to shift exclusively to that. The last benchmark here shows some of that with Postgres if you're looking for numbers (not an exhaustive test by any stretch): https://lchsk.com/benchmarking-concurrent-operations-in-post...

SQLite is single writer, so transaction isolation is easy, writes are linear by their very nature.

Cockroach does some really funky stuff, but its serialization guarantees are only within certain conditions. Traditionally it has also had low write throughput compared to other systems, mainly due to its distributed nature. Jepsen touches on that here https://jepsen.io/analyses/cockroachdb-beta-20160829 though things have vastly improved since then.

To your earlier point, it may not even matter depending on the workload, or if you're aware of your database limitations. In cases where it does matter then being aware of the limitations of something like Repeatable Read makes the trade-off worth it.
bennysaurus
·3 lata temu·discuss
Potential timeouts for clients/workstations trying to reach microsoft.com.

Which entry is picked for use is generally random depending on the client.

Most systems will retry using another entry though on issues connecting through. That said, if you are on a network that is 192.168 based, trying to get to Microsoft.com may just send you to your local router!
bennysaurus
·3 lata temu·discuss
Things is source code management these days even in mainframe but many shops still have you log into the same "box" to do your development. It can get pretty fun when trying to coordinate testing and patches.
bennysaurus
·3 lata temu·discuss
Do you know what they're using? Are they going to Microficus COBOL or doing something different?
bennysaurus
·3 lata temu·discuss
Given the name, it'll be Qix, I had a copy as well!

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qix
bennysaurus
·3 lata temu·discuss
It has its quirks on occasion and has changed a bit but has been around since 2007 and still going great.