Myself and a few others I know take Vyvanse instead of Ritalin or Adderall. I haven't had built any resistance yet but it's only been a year or two.
I like it better as it feels less harsh on my system. My doctor said that people will metabolize each type of ADHD medicine differently. Maybe a different compound would work better for you.
There’s a whole section on the page with the header “Concern over numerous patches to the match ergonomics feature”.
So if your question is literally, “Does anybody else...” then the answer is yes:
“Users have expressed concern with the frequency of patch releases to fix bugs in the match ergonomics verification by the current borrow checker on a variety of Rust’s forums. ”
If the question is more about being concerned yourself, do the reasons listed in the link address your concerns?
Go has several packages supporting program analysis in the standard library. https://golang.org/pkg/go/types/#Info populates separate maps for Defs and Uses. Check out the source for how they walk the SSA and calculate def-use chains.
> The Uber opportunity for Grindr is to establish itself as the leader of a new social movement that encompasses gender, racial, and religious equality and freedom.
I don't think the author sufficiently explained what exactly they mean by this nor why this should be true.
It's unclear to me what exactly is envisioned by, "a new social movement that encompasses gender, racial, and religious equality and freedom" in two ways.
First: what specifically are the proposed changes to the current service designed "to connect gay men for physical encounters" to meet this new mission or goal? For example, does the author envision that Grindr should move from a single service to a broader social media platform? Does the author envision Grindr expanding its user base beyond "gay men"? Does the author envision Grindr extending services beyond "physical encounters"? I feel that without concrete proposed changes it is unclear to me what the author imagines the future Grindr would look like.
Second: what specifically is meant by "equality and freedom"? Perhaps this is an unfair criticism because these terms are contentious, more abstract, or simply outside of the scope of what the author intended to discuss. The author does mention a future Grindr that takes "strong social positions" and which would cause "[s]ocial change ... followed by political change and then policy change". But since the author did not define what they meant by "equality and freedom" nor did they offer examples of social, political, or policy changes, it is unclear to me what the author is envisioning the future Grindr would actually accomplish.
By the end of the article I don't have a good sense of what the author thinks future Grindr looks like, what it does, what its new mission is, nor how it accomplishes it. I feel that there is a big discontinuity between a suggested short-term goal of fixing the existing app because it has a two-star rating to a suggested long-term goal of the CEO winning "the Nobel Peace Price just like Martin Luther King Jr." Hyperbole or not, I feel that there are several important conceptual steps missing in between these two.
Since the thesis was neither explained nor proved as a result hile reading the article I kept asking myself, "Why Grindr? Why not Kickstarter, or Kiva, or Facebook, or some other existing service with users?"
What ever it is the author was trying to convey, I don't think the article's reasoning is clear, sound, or complete.
Good catch! I read that paragraph the same way and I believe it is a typo. I've left a comment on the medium article asking the author to clarify that section.
If you don't mind me asking, what is so off-putting about these types of mistakes? I'd like to do more personal and professional technical writing similar to this but I find it a bit daunting, especially when I consider that my audience could know much more about a subject than I do. Do you have any suggestions on how I could or should write articles that may contain errors so I don't upset readers?
I think it depends on where the NULL is and what it represents.
If NULL value is in a field that is used for JOIN-ing, I don't think you would "represent" the NULL value as much as you would simply have a lack of data. For example, if you had some set of results from a query that contained a JOIN on a field and some values were NULL, those records with the NULL value would not be in the result set.
If we do receive results with possibly NULL values I believe they could be either be represented with an appropriate zero value -- e.g. "" or 0 -- or with an optional type like another commenter suggested.
I like it better as it feels less harsh on my system. My doctor said that people will metabolize each type of ADHD medicine differently. Maybe a different compound would work better for you.