HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

coldspoon95

no profile record

comments

coldspoon95
·12 miesięcy temu·discuss
Wondering if we could spatially place a bunch of these to make a time based gravitational wave detectors. A single location could infer magnitude, and direction of a gravitational wave.

I propose calling it TIGO(Time Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory) ;-)
coldspoon95
·w zeszłym roku·discuss
So get government out of the space here. Keep essential regulations for ensuring safety and so that insurance companies can cover liabilities. Let the free market play it out.

If the profit incentives are there(which there are as higher EROI = lowest cost per kWh), then it is a race to who can provide the product(energy) at the lowest cost more reliably.

Government unfortunately has a monopoly here as traditional reactors had proliferations concerns, needed much large capital, and political will. But if reactors can be modular and costs low that a city could afford it, then you can also have decentralized reactors just like you have with solar.
coldspoon95
·w zeszłym roku·discuss
Exactly my point. Solar and Wind being intermittent require additional expense of grid storage which other forms of energy do not need.

So to scale, for each GW of solar, you’ll need a GW of storage plus the energy reserve to take through the night. Can’t rely on wind here as that’s also intermittent.

And grid storage is energy intensive and sets up twisted incentives for those playing to get rich with energy arbitrage. Think solar farm generators owning their own grid storage and reducing solar output to sell at higher $ from storage. Because, with intermittent sources pricing has to be more dynamic.
coldspoon95
·w zeszłym roku·discuss
High EROI = high profit for investors
coldspoon95
·w zeszłym roku·discuss
From a pure physics and first principles perspective, a higher EROI implies higher scalability and lower costs.

Nuclear today has high costs associated to it due to uncertainty in permitting, high upfront costs due to red-tape, annd archaic regulations that stifle any innovation. These make risk management prohibitively expensive as is the cost of insuring them. If the catastrophic rate of failure and associated deaths are far far smaller than what’s generally accepted in society(think fatalities due to vehicle accidents), then we must work to removing the red-tape to ease construction of these. They’re also far more green to operate.

This way, we can keep solar for residential, and for industries to offset their own use(think data centers investing in their own energy supply instead of paying others. Think on-premise vs off-premise).
coldspoon95
·w zeszłym roku·discuss
[flagged]