davidrusu

4 lata temudiscuss

you're in luck, bitwarden has got a cli see: https://bitwarden.com/help/cli/

4 lata temudiscuss

Really nice to see BFT starting to be taken seriously in CRDT research. I had done some research in this area last year and came to a lot of the same solutions (i.e. BRB protected CRDTs when dealing with VClock based CRDTs):

https://github.com/davidrusu/bft-crdts

We ended up moving away from VClock crdts entirely for our work and going with grow-only hash-graph CRDTs as they have don't need the BRB overhead (as Martin has found in his research as well).

davidrusu

4 lata temudiscuss

A shot of the pulse from within the reactor: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMuOaTqdp4c

davidrusu

5 lat temudiscuss

I will stop looking into this now, I have to get back to my work. The colorful language doesn't make it easy for someone who follows the literature to review your idea.

I still have doubts that you can handle a dropped message or how much control a faulty node has over decisions, but I'll leave that to you to work out.

davidrusu

5 lat temudiscuss

Ok, the red flag to me is the reliance on all neighbours responding to a proposal.

Suppose we have a faulty node heart-beating correctly but not responding to proposals, or selectively responding to proposals.

This would seem to imply that dishonest nodes have full control over which decisions are made.

davidrusu

5 lat temudiscuss

> n ∈ N (p), where N (g) is the set of gnomes who can hear g, including himself. Note that h ∈ N (g) ⇐⇒ g ∈ N (h).

> Each gnome g tracks the spread of the proposal in the following way: once all his neighbors n ∈ N (g) say their k-neighborhood (or bigger) is aware of the proposal

If I understand this correctly, a single node crashing would stall it's entire neighbourhood. @gritzko, can you confirm?

davidrusu

5 lat temudiscuss

    Account created: 1606866784432 (unix millis)

That's Tue Dec 01 2020 23:53:04 UTC, consider this a heads up if that's when you started using signal.

davidrusu

5 lat temudiscuss

Hmmmmm..

    noun.
    pixer

      a black person
      "a pixer of social propriety with no real social skills"

https://l.thisworddoesnotexist.com/CghV

davidrusu

5 lat temudiscuss

Varies by business, for sure.

I'd say the chance is much higher for B2B businesses. Say my Shopify store fails so I cancel my subscription. But I'll likely come back and try my luck again with Shopify on my next idea since I've learned the platform.

davidrusu

5 lat temudiscuss

These companies should realize they are playing an iterated prisoners dilemma game with their customers. Just because your services aren't right for me today, doesn't mean I won't come back in the future and pay for your services again now that I know what you do.

But I doubt I'd come back if my last experience with a company has been a bad cancellation procedure.

Submissions

Confidentiality of shareholder votes has no impact on results

Helion – Trenta Fusion Reactor 2020 Results[video]

Can you drill into a supervolcano to relieve pressure? (2016)

comments