Sad to see that the top comment has been removed. The comment was likely flagged by someone who is over-sensitive and/or over-zealous, either way it pisses me off.
There should exist a setting to voluntarily remove the ‘flagged by community’ filter. Just like adult-content filters on search engines, I should be able to opt-in to seeing whatever content is/was available.
I am up-to-date on all of my required vaccines, however the ‘Covid vaccine’ is a vaccine by name only—so much so that the CDC had to update the definition of a vaccine LMAO!
Until the shot has several years of longitudinal case data available for analysis, I will remain uncomfortable taking the untested artificially designed gene therapy all for a disease that poses insignificant risk to me. Sorry for being a jerk, frustrating times
You are incorrect, on many points. I am unwilling to deeply elaborate about vaccines or immune systems, however want to state my rejection of your faulty logic publicly (need more of this).
Ultimately the ‘actions of vaccines’ is to instantiate immunity, which the Covid ‘vaccine’ fails to do.
Please educate yourself about the differences between a vaccine vs a therapeutic. Words matter. Just because having elevated levels of ser Vitamin-C effectively reduces one’s exposure to catching the common-cold DOESN’T mean I can recklessly label Emergen-C as a ‘cold vaccine’.
Glad you handled it well. My experience with Covid was even less mild (felt like a small hangover at worst). Clearly I am not at risk for hospitalization due to Covid, however am being pressured to receive a vaccine that I do not want/need/trust.
I still do not understand how smart/intelligent people can defend, or outright vehemently advocate for, vaccine mandates given that what we know (not to mention that what we don’t). Brings to mind the following quote by Benjamin Disraeli; ‘the whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so sure of themselves, yet wiser people are full of doubt.’
> 30% efficacy (of preventing transmission) is really good for vaccines.
Seriously? If you were to double that number, such a poor efficacy rate (e.g. 60%) would not even be worthy of classification as a “vaccine” per standards prior to 2019. Truth is this drug should never have been classified as a “vaccine” in the first place, but scientific standards took the backseat as fear and panic overruled. The need for having a “vaccine solution” was so paramount that we turned a blind eye to any red flags and crucified anyone who pointed out the obviously concerning facts about the Covid vaccine solution such as 1/ it was developed in less than a week, 2/ development was led by a company with zero prior successful products launched ever, 3/ used technology never been used at scale (let alone universally) 4/ all profit-driven biotech/pharma companies willing to participate were offered free money AND complete protection from ANY liability resulting from the ‘vac’ granted by .gov.
There should exist a setting to voluntarily remove the ‘flagged by community’ filter. Just like adult-content filters on search engines, I should be able to opt-in to seeing whatever content is/was available.