> Most probably you deeply don’t care about the company’s mission in general.
Nope. Of course I don't. It's just a job. I am paid to deliver value during a pre-agreed set of hours and nothing more. I will do my work to the best of my ability during that time, after which I dngaf. The company, in turn, will treat me as a non-entity when it suits (eg. will lay me off in hard times). It is for the owner of the company/stakeholders to care about the mission, since they are the ones who profit from that care (and from the naive care of others who have no stake and yet are tricked into one-sided "loyalty").
Life is too short to put that much care and effort into making someone else a ton of money.
Ori Industries | Mid/Senior Dev & SRE roles | Global | Full-time | Remote
Ori is looking for mid/senior level devs and SREs to work on cloud-native stuff. We build upon Kubernetes to provision Kubernetes clusters for Edge infrastructure.
We do mostly Go at the moment and are looking at Rust for some critical parts.
The company is remote-first with a base office in London.
Have you heard of exercism.io? The mentors are pretty good at leading you to good solutions through constructive critiques, rather than trollish tear-downs.
I would agree with others who say it depends on the school and the student.
The most important thing to note about bootcamps is that their "Learn to code in N weeks" is an exaggerated sales pitch. No bootcamp alone can get you job ready in that time, in sort of the same way that doing a CS degree but doing basically no coding modules will not make you very hireable (as an engineer).
The bootcamp students who do well are those who understand that the course simply fast-tracks you through the first stages of learning, and gives you strong and useful tools to learn further. These are only strong and useful if you acknowledge this and decide to use them and keep improving (maybe by filling in the CS theory which as another poster noted, is missing from bootcamp curriculum).
I don't understand the point of this article. Computers are genderless (or sexless, as the author prefers). Whether you believe (or don't believe) trans peoples' assertions that they are trans, their impact on you, or anyone else, is nil. I am sorry the author feels it is so hard to show decency to those living different experiences that he can no longer "be accepted in polite company". I am not sure why the very easy task of not insulting and abusing others is "Orwellian" (as for the alleged rebranding of sex/gender: who cares?). I am also sorry there is nothing else he has to do in his own life, despite his claim otherwise (if true, why write this?).
Nope. Of course I don't. It's just a job. I am paid to deliver value during a pre-agreed set of hours and nothing more. I will do my work to the best of my ability during that time, after which I dngaf. The company, in turn, will treat me as a non-entity when it suits (eg. will lay me off in hard times). It is for the owner of the company/stakeholders to care about the mission, since they are the ones who profit from that care (and from the naive care of others who have no stake and yet are tricked into one-sided "loyalty"). Life is too short to put that much care and effort into making someone else a ton of money.