HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

gilnaa

no profile record

comments

gilnaa
·3 lata temu·discuss
Like an onion
gilnaa
·4 lata temu·discuss
Polars is already not python
gilnaa
·4 lata temu·discuss
gilnaa
·4 lata temu·discuss
EDITOR=true is clever! Git has --no-edit as well, btw
gilnaa
·4 lata temu·discuss
Panics _can_ sometimes conceptually share the same implementation as exceptions, but given that their usage is not the same, and the fact that the ecosystem doesn't use panics as exceptions, it's a bit of stretch saying they're "functionally" the same.

A bit like saying trains and chairs are functionally the same since they both can have wheels; when there's the crucial difference that chairs don't go choo-choo.
gilnaa
·4 lata temu·discuss
Isn't this why Windows have MOV EDI, EDI at the start of a function? https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20110921-00/?p=95...
gilnaa
·4 lata temu·discuss
"I want X" "Here's Y" "Yeah no"
gilnaa
·4 lata temu·discuss
Not to mention that it didn't even get into C++
gilnaa
·4 lata temu·discuss
You put #[non_exhaustive] on a enum in Rust to force users matching on it to handle an "else"/"default" case, so that you can add more variants to this enum in the future without breaking their code.

It doesn't mean that the enum itself is non exhaustive: at any point in time when enum is defined, it defines all of its variants and any other value is still UB.
gilnaa
·4 lata temu·discuss
It's not that it is unstable as much as it is needlessly painful to work with.