HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

halfinvested

no profile record

comments

halfinvested
·3 lata temu·discuss
[flagged]
halfinvested
·3 lata temu·discuss
[flagged]
halfinvested
·3 lata temu·discuss
abuse, harassment and threats targeted at people are illegal. I agree that they're unacceptable.

Ideas have no such legal protection, for good reason. If they are stupid or poorly presented, they can be dunked on for cool points. This is one kind of activity people enjoy doing and spectating on public forums, and it's a net positive to society.

> I want experts to be able to talk about their work without feeling abused, harassed, or threatened

> Should someone feel they have to self-censor just to avoid this?

You keep mentioning feelings. This is what I'm responding to. I get the impression that you want the law to step in and silence other people when you feel bad. In public, such an arrangement is stupid. Conversely, it can be beneficial in private spaces where participants consent to community guidelines, formal or informal, at the outset.

If we agree that policing public speech based solely on what people feel is a bad policy, then this whole conversation has been sound and fury, signifying nothing.

And if we disagree, all I can leave you with is this: what if whatever harmless, perfectly legal thing you say makes somebody else feel bad? Should you be silenced?
halfinvested
·3 lata temu·discuss
> I want experts to be able to talk about their work without feeling abused, harassed, or threatened

Most experts are idiots (specifically “intellectual yet idiot“). Protecting bad ideas (expert or not) against criticism is an immense danger to society.

If your ideas and findings can’t stand on their own, I can’t help but think they must not be very strong.

Oh and if you think that what you post on the internet is you, and it’s you personally that’s being attacked when people respond to your words…

Please ask yourself if that’s true.
halfinvested
·3 lata temu·discuss
People are going to feel all kinds of things. Asking whether or not they should feel them is a dead end in the context of public forums, because nobody controls anybody else's feelings, or how each individual reacts to a feeling.

Sincere, productive conversations are mostly going to take place in more private forums like group chat or face to face. Public discussion threads are better suited for identifying friends and enemies, playing and joking around, and signaling status.
halfinvested
·3 lata temu·discuss
Anecdote: I know a guy who works solo and throws every project away (usually games) at least five times, often more like ten.

According to him, each iteration tends to go smoother and faster than the last.

Edit:

There’s probably some nuance to whether this approach is a good idea based on type of software, size of team, experience level, personal and/or team skill set, etc…
halfinvested
·3 lata temu·discuss
TLDR:

  - Social software requires designing for group success, not just individual success.
  - Software developers need to consider the sociology and anthropology of the group that will be using their software.
  - Human groups are committed to individual identity and group membership, which can lead to groups becoming their own worst enemy.
  - Group structure exists to keep a group on target, on track, on message, on charter, to keep a group focused on its own sophisticated goals and away from sliding into basic patterns.
  - Large groups require different design considerations than small groups.
  - The responsibility for defining value and defending it should be put into the hands of the group itself, rather than trying to describe everything in the software up front.
  - A core group arises that cares about the community as a whole and takes care of the social environment by encouraging good behavior and discouraging bad behavior.
  - Reputation systems are not always effective in human situations.
  - Ease of use should be designed for the group, not just the individual.
  - Conversations require dense two-way conversations, and human interaction doesn't scale up like a balloon.
generated by https://kagi.com/