The warning can be suppressed by `--no-xattrs --no-mac-metadata`.
- tar czf dist.tar.gz dist
+ COPYFILE_DISABLE=1 tar czf dist.tar.gz dist “Duplication is far cheaper than wrong abstraction." 1. The scale of the fraud was too big
2. From emails it seemed she intentionally tricked investors
3. The product, medical equipment, endangered patients.
$ gcloud compute instances stop instance-1 --project=my-app-dev
$ gcloud compute instances set-machine-type instance-1 --machine-type=c3-highcpu-176 --project=my-app-dev
$ gcloud sql instances patch db-1 --tier=db-custom-32-131072 --project=my-app-dev
$ gcloud projects list
PROJECT_ID NAME PROJECT_NUMBER
my-app-test my app 123456789012
my-app-dev my app 234567890123 <- the dev project I was working on
my-app my app 345678901234 <- the production (I know it's a bad name)
$ gcloud sql instances patch db-1 --database-flags=max_connections=500 --project=my-app
$ gcloud compute instances delete instance-1 --project=my-app
$ echo 'DELETE FROM users WHERE username="test";' \
| gcloud sql connect my-db
--user=user --database=my-db --project=my-app
$ wrk -t4 -c200 -d30s \
"http://$(gcloud compute instances describe instance-1 \
--project=my-app \
--format='get(networkInterfaces[0].accessConfigs[0].natIP)')"
It took me like five years to realize it was really not good idea for a small B2B business to spend a part of the limited resources in that. I needed several experiences to understand that in many cases good customer relationship and reliable system is much more important. But it wasn’t until recently that I started thinking like “wait, if it tricks the users into doing something they’re unwilling to do, isn’t it unethical?”
It makes me wonder how little we think about the ethics and the consequences of our investment. It’s not like we understand it’s unethical but do it anyway for profit. We simply don’t care how unethical it can be, not even slightly, until the evidence of the harmful effects are not negligible after years and decades.