"Pretend to act, or look and feel, like a trusted entity — like your own device or browser, or the website itself."
This is a broad statement. Taken at face value, this covers all native advertising - with articles/images/videos/thumbnails/etc intended to fit in with the content of the site/app.
References allowing seamless refunds, for content that the reader doesn't find up to quality. With clickbait articles getting higher refund rates.
"At Blendle we see this every day. Gossip magazines, for example, get much higher refund percentages than average (some up to 50% of purchases), as some of them are basically clickbait in print."
While referencing for content as a whole "On average, in only 5% of the cases a user asks for a refund."
I hadn't, but just tried restarting safari, restarting device, and clearing safari history/data - and still having the same output.
* I'm completely fine with this being the case. Before installing I was completely unsure if it would work for iOS9 before trying (not expectant with it still being beta, but simply curious as it's an interesting approach).
Why would you append on every loop. Rather than build the string and then append the whole lot on one block?
If you compare the DOM of the original fiddle and the DOM of following the fiddle I posted. You will see they are the same.
I'm not saying what I referenced is the 'best' way of doing things. But that the debate in the original article (based on the provided examples) is pretty null.
Amongst some other projects by Adam Harvey centered on facial recognition: https://ahprojects.com/projects/