HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

jamesrom

no profile record

comments

jamesrom
·18 dni temu·discuss
safely-bump-deps.sh does not need to do impossibly hard things. It can just call npm: outdated, install --save-exact and/or install --package-lock-only. There's plenty of solutions here.

Pushing this into a hook makes it invisible, implicit, hard to debug, and an entry point for all sorts of undefined behaviours.
jamesrom
·19 dni temu·discuss
This is the opposite of "do one thing and do it well" unix philosophy.

You don't need your package manager to invoke your hook. You need _your_ tooling to invoke your hook.

./safely-bump-deps.sh && npm install

Want it global? Use a bash alias.
jamesrom
·3 miesiące temu·discuss
That egotist got you to create an account to post that.
jamesrom
·3 miesiące temu·discuss
A lot of odd takes in the comments.

I think the most correct take is that seeing a the top bun slightly off is more realistic and honest.

Respecting your customers, even in advertising, is appreciated.
jamesrom
·3 miesiące temu·discuss
Mos takes it even further, the top bun is completely off.
jamesrom
·4 miesiące temu·discuss
The problem with MCP isn't MCP. It's the way it's invoked by your agent.

IMO, by default MCP tools should run in forked context. Only a compacted version of the tool response should be returned to the main context. This costs tokens yes, but doesn't blow out your entire context.

If other information is required post-hoc, the full response can be explored on disk.
jamesrom
·4 miesiące temu·discuss
What part of MCP do you think is over-engineered?

This is quite literally the opposite opinion I and many others had when first exploring MCP. It's so _obviously_ simple, which is why it gained traction in the first place.
jamesrom
·6 miesięcy temu·discuss
This comment defines the next era of software development.
jamesrom
·7 miesięcy temu·discuss
> It's significantly more wicked to pretend that tests, treatments, and more aren't done by healthcare workers (yes, even private ones), and to inundate them with unimportant medical procedures while truly sick people are dying.

Strawman+ad hominem. No one is suggesting to pretend _anything_. Charge premiums for these tests based on how "unimportant" they are. Use market forces to move money from those willing to pay, to those who cannot.
jamesrom
·7 miesięcy temu·discuss
Then here's an idea: instead of hiding that information, you can explain it to the patient.

You have no authority to treat your patient like a child.
jamesrom
·7 miesięcy temu·discuss
> We already have an extreme shortage of available healthcare workers. We don't need to stress them further because 20% of the population suddenly decides they need 80 elective surgeries to remove things that would've gone away or stayed benign on their own.

Strawman. No one is suggesting adding extra stress to healthcare workers. It's also not you or your doctors call to make: let's gatekeep this patients cancer because our hospital can't deal with the workload. What a truly wicked idea.

To help alleviate the extreme shortage of available healthcare workers we should instead allow those wanting to pay for these elective surgeries, to pay for them! Drive money into healthcare, scale up treatments, drive money into research. Let the system work.

Don't just turn off the lights and shut the door.
jamesrom
·9 miesięcy temu·discuss
If you need a case study on "kill your darlings", read this.
jamesrom
·10 lat temu·discuss
I thought that fMRI hasn't been taken seriously since they scanned a dead fish and found it was thinking.
jamesrom
·14 lat temu·discuss
In an ideal world, the spec would be the test. A spec is just a human readable test. A test is just a machine readable spec.