Given the well-known problems with Tesla's Autopilot and (not even close) Full Self Driving, I wonder how many Tesla accidents occurred as a result of driver inattention.
Unfortunately, the study just counted accidents and did not look into what kinds of accidents occurred. It would be fantastic to be able to conduct further research.
Like with anything publicly traded, the price of a share is principally derived from belief. Much of this belief comes from a person projecting where the price will be in the future. With Tesla, many people and institutions projected that that price would increase in the future. Now many of them do not.
Belief in the direction of the price can come from examining the financial fundamentals of a company and the perceived value that it may increasingly generate ("fundamental analysis'). Or it can be speculative, where people believe other people will buy (or sell) more based on observed buying/selling activity ("technical analysis").
With Tesla, many investors were using their own version of technical analysis that far surpassed the valuation that a reasonable fundamental analysis would have derived and even derive today. There was and is a mania, much like there has been and there is for many forms of cryptocurrency.
The recently declining price is likely due to a collective perception that Tesla has been overpriced and, due to recent factors, that the fundamentals that justify the pricing for a share will diverge even further from its recent pricing. From a fundamental level, Tesla was unlikely to justify its recent pricing. An irony is that the earlier mania was so intense even today, after such a pronounced plunge from the start of the year, it likely remains seriously overvalued.
It's unlikely that the rate of improvement, however you estimate it, will continue at the same rate. This is a Pareto effect, with marginal gains ever more difficult to obtain.
And the edge cases FSD can handle will be impaired by the sensors they do (not) install. While they make a good point that sensor fusion can impair comprehension, the removal of radar makes it hard to avoid the edge cases most calamitous.
Blackout curtains. I and I imagine, most people, are sensitive to light. Blackout curtains prevent light from reaching your eyes, resulting in your getting more sleep.
Eyemasks are also effective, but (1) you have to tolerate having something on your face and (2) they can get dislodged while you are sleeping, rendering them ineffective.
Riffing off of BugsJustFindMe's comment, what kind of privacy/security can you offer at this time? I would love to use a tool like Mozart, but I work with data that contains protected health information (PHI). PHI requires a greater degree of privacy. People working with proprietary financial information have similar concerns.
Unfortunately, the study just counted accidents and did not look into what kinds of accidents occurred. It would be fantastic to be able to conduct further research.