HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

jwmerrill

no profile record

Submissions

Personal Calculator Has Key to Solve Any Equation (1979) [pdf]

people.eecs.berkeley.edu
3 points·by jwmerrill·w zeszłym roku·1 comments

comments

jwmerrill
·9 miesięcy temu·discuss
“Passive voice” is a grammatical term.

“Amazon confirms 14,000 job losses,” is not an example of the passive voice.

“14,000 workers were fired by Amazon,” is an example of the passive voice.

There is not a 1:1 relationship between being vague about agency and using the passive voice.
jwmerrill
·w zeszłym roku·discuss
The article is a four part series.
jwmerrill
·w zeszłym roku·discuss
This is also the inverse Gudermannian function [1]. That Wikipedia page has some nice geometrical insights.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gudermannian_function
jwmerrill
·w zeszłym roku·discuss
My mistake! It seems clear in hindsight…
jwmerrill
·w zeszłym roku·discuss
The next pointer doesn’t have to go first in the structure here. It can go anywhere, and you can use @fieldParentPtr to go back from a reference to the embedded node to a reference to the structure.
jwmerrill
·2 lata temu·discuss
For problems in the plane, it's natural to pick two coordinate functions and treat other quantities as functions of these. For example, you might pick x and y, or r and θ, or the distances from two different points, or...

In thermodynamics, there often isn't really one "best" choice of two coordinate functions among the many possibilities (pressure, temperature, volume, energy, entropy... these are the must common but you could use arbitrarily many others in principle), and it's natural to switch between these coordinates even within a single problem.

Coming back to the more familiar x, y, r, and θ, you can visualize these 4 coordinate functions by plotting iso-contours for each of them in the plane. Holding one of these coordinate functions constant picks out a curve (its iso-contour) through a given point. Derivatives involving the other coordinates holding that coordinate constant are ratios of changes in the other coordinates along this iso-contour.

For example, you can think of evaluating dr/dx along a curve of constant y or along a curve of constant θ, and these are different.

I first really understood this way of thinking from an unpublished book chapter of Jaynes [1]. Gibbs "Graphical Methods In The Thermodynamics of Fluids" [2] is also a very interesting discussion of different ways of representing thermodynamic processes by diagrams in the plane. His companion paper, "A method of geometrical representation of the thermodynamic properties of substances by means of surfaces" describes an alternative representation as a surface embedded in a larger space, and these two different pictures are complimentary and both very useful.

[1] https://bayes.wustl.edu/etj/thermo/stat.mech.1.pdf

[2] https://www3.nd.edu/~powers/ame.20231/gibbs1873a.pdf