HackerLangs
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

lsaferite

2,929 karmajoined 14 lat temu

comments

lsaferite
·1 godzinę temu·discuss
> Your screen brightness too low? Believe or not, blocked.

... What?!
lsaferite
·4 godziny temu·discuss
But logging in gets you a new hash with your new org id, right?
lsaferite
·6 godzin temu·discuss
I know wet soil is detectable with a magnetometer, I wonder if they would work for detecting wetness inside walls...
lsaferite
·przedwczoraj·discuss
Having not watched Foundation, what was the issue there?

I loved Altered Carbon Season 1, but couldn't get into Season 2 and never finished it. I never read the book(s?), so the storyline was standalone for me.
lsaferite
·8 dni temu·discuss
If reading 1 and a half paragraphs is too much, then I guess we shouldn't try to communicate.
lsaferite
·8 dni temu·discuss
I find your comment here interesting. The parent never called out LLM-coding, they said "sloppers". If we take that choice of word as deliberate, it stands to reason there's a distinction there between "sloppers" and LLM assisted coding in general. You quoting "This is not true of every slopper" as proof they are equating the two seems like a weakly defended assertion. It's entirely possible there are 3 broad classes of LLM users in the parent's explicit and implicit beliefs. The thing is, you don't know any more than I know. You are attributing a held belief to someone that you inferred from incomplete information. That being said, if you based your assertion on external, unreferenced knowledge, then you could potentially know they hold that belief.

I'd venture to say that a large number of developers are using LLM tooling at this point. Not all of those developers are out there generating massive, poorly engineered PRs and wasting project maintainer time. For me there are at least those 3 broad categories of user of LLMs for software development, maybe more if I sat and thought about it for a while.
lsaferite
·10 dni temu·discuss
Any interpretation that excludes non-citizens leaves us in a situation where we've disclaimed legal jurisdiction over the behavior of those individuals. The reductio ad absurdum there would be that they aren't subject to any laws of our country anymore.
lsaferite
·10 dni temu·discuss
Have you read the congressional debate around the that amendment to the Amendment? If you have and it's not clear, I'm not sure what else can be said.
lsaferite
·12 dni temu·discuss
Factorio manages to pull it off and I'd argue they are tracking far more individual entities.
lsaferite
·16 dni temu·discuss
Those taalus chips apparently run at 1/10 the power as the current SOTA GPU setups. If they can execute even partially on their plan, it'll be a literal game changer.
lsaferite
·16 dni temu·discuss
They are betting on fast release cycles coupled with much lower costs (purchase and operations) mixed with the ability to have dynamic fine tunes on top of the static model.
lsaferite
·16 dni temu·discuss
https://taalas.com/
lsaferite
·17 dni temu·discuss
My next vacation project is basically this, but as an offline-capable PWA served from a 100% static site. I don't want to install apps for these types of games and I want them to fully function on my phone when I'm offline.
lsaferite
·30 dni temu·discuss
Saying "This" on a post about "Mimo Code" leads one to, rightly, assume you are referring to "Mimo Code". If they commentor wanted to make a comment about a specific model it would have be clearer to simply mention the model instead of getting there transitively.
lsaferite
·2 miesiące temu·discuss
As I sit in bed at midnight, winding down from my day, this comment gave me a great belly laugh. Thanks!
lsaferite
·2 miesiące temu·discuss
I would caution against thinking it's difficult for an LLM. I've used them in raw data file analysis and they are frequently shockingly good at pulling structures and meaning out of seemingly random data. Disassembled binaries already are structured, so pulling code flow out of that is easier. Mixing that with existing disassembly and inspection tooling and an LLM has what is needed to fast track this kind of vulnerability research. Point being, an LLM with the proper tools can potentially follow code flow from disassembled binaries way easier than a human.
lsaferite
·2 miesiące temu·discuss
That may explain it then. I use flight controllers and driving controllers. Both just show up as generic HID devices and both are easily used in the games I play.
lsaferite
·2 miesiące temu·discuss
Just out of curiosity, what modern game won't function with a generic HID game controller?
lsaferite
·2 miesiące temu·discuss
> you can enumerate as multiple devices if needed

A single physical USB device can enumerate as multiple virtual devices. This lets you easily side-step the limits *if* the game supports input from multiple controllers at the same time. The games I use controllers for allow you to map to multiple controllers, mouse, and keyboard, all at once. The touchpad could simply enumerate as a HID Touchpad. Apparently Windows already has a Touchpad Haptic HID Profile even.

Honestly, if Valve is making you require Steam to fully use the Steam Controller, that's disappointing because, as far as I can tell, nothing it's doing can't be accessed via HID usage.
lsaferite
·2 miesiące temu·discuss
Windows supports Generic HID game controllers with 8 axis and 128 buttons already. And a few hat switches. And if your devices needs more than that, you can enumerate as multiple devices if needed. Not sure if there is a HID type for rumble support though. So, there's no reason a Steam Controller couldn't operate without a special driver. Some functionality may require custom software to support though. I have several Virpil controls and the entire setup will function as a simple set of generic HID devices. The only special bit is some software you can optionally run to control advance per-application remapping. I don't have a Steam Controller, so I have no idea if it can show up as a generic HID controller or not.