marysol5 · HackerTrans

.gov.uk plenty of them use standard CA's

manchester.gov.uk uses LE

Meanwhile you crawl anybody else?

.gov isn't magically any more able to take you to court than a private org

CT logs are funny, not enough people know about them. Whenever I speak to people they're shocked to know that "internal" subdomains get exposed through them.

marysol5

4 dni temudiscuss

While it's not functionality, the batteries will be physically smaller, and thus less capacity.

marysol5

4 dni temudiscuss

Anycast goes BRRRRRRRRR

Just because YOU query a server, doesn't mean that a user somewhere else is querying the same server.

marysol5

4 dni temudiscuss

Memory safe, but idea unsafe

marysol5

4 dni temudiscuss

Not to mention 8.8.8.8 queried from the UK and from the US aren't the same place....

marysol5

4 dni temudiscuss

Is there really enough market for an actual software solution like this?

I worked alongside the lost&found office at an old job, we just had a spreadsheet and a book...

marysol5

4 dni temudiscuss

>When something turns up at a stadium or an airport, staff photograph it, log it, and wait. Hundreds of places use one software tool for managing lost items, and I scraped their archives: thousands of accidental portraits of lost stuff.

Where? What Software? What Archive?

So many photos of peoples lock screens with clearly visible faces...

marysol5

4 dni temudiscuss

>own their datacenters and sell cloud services instead of paying for someone's else cloud.

Or because it's cost-effective to slice up your infrastructure and sell off the bits you're not using right now.

marysol5

4 dni temudiscuss

In your context you still "share" with a dedicated server too. It's not your rack, it's not your IPMI/OOB, even on bare metal. Components in the server are running all sorts of their own code.

All of these layers are a form of risk

marysol5

4 dni temudiscuss

"WHY DONT WE DO CARPARKS!"

"Because it's up to the owners?"

marysol5

4 dni temudiscuss

Dave always points at them as "bad" because they can be better in other places.

But ignore the bit of "why not both"

marysol5

4 dni temudiscuss

Having ideas that you got interest in, developed the product, built out the website. And then never finished with. Which has since become a massive success for other people

cries

marysol5

4 dni temudiscuss

cries in British Rail

marysol5

4 dni temudiscuss

And then dismiss any criticisms of it as "paid agitator"

marysol5

4 dni temudiscuss

Solar Naysayers are so odd. "If it's not a 100% PERFECT solution we shouldn't do it"

marysol5

4 dni temudiscuss

So maintenance, which is required anyway.

marysol5

4 dni temudiscuss

Of course he didn't, he partially described exactly what they're doing

marysol5

4 dni temudiscuss

>more prone to damage there from stuff falling off the trains, derailments, etc

How often is a train derailed? And even then everything has to be replaced anyway...

Same goes for "stuff falling off", you can easily replace the panel(s)

comments