As someone who works in a sensitive field, I would absolutely never run this risk. I'm grateful that my current employer invests in solid tooling to make the experience largely positive.
Cloudflare Tunnels only support exposing what mostly amounts to HTTP-based services. If you're using other protocols for e.g. a game server, or something else, it won't fly unless you are also running the WARP client locally.
I agree with a lot of the other comments regarding the accuracy of the substitutions suggested here. Having said that, I do think 'very' is overused in daily conversational English. I've found myself replacing it with 'quite' more often now, just for personal taste.
Should there be? I think this is an evolving question that would settle a number of ambiguities in the law.
If one were to die tomorrow without being an organ donor, the state still cannot compel one to give up their organs, even if it would save lives. Why should a woman’s body have less autonomy than a corpse?
On the other hand, I don’t think many people would support 39-week abortions either, absent some explicit medical necessity. At some point, which is inherently a gradient, our legal system has to afford protection to what is a viable person.
Americans have a tendency to go for the most extreme positions on everything and I think the court reversing Roe is an incredibly shortsighted decision that will cost it decades of legitimacy. The institution is more damaged now than possibly ever. Even the Chief Justice had wanted to uphold Mississippi’s law but preserve Roe, which would’ve been a much better solution than where we are today.
Regarding guns, the dissent argues that “well-regulated” and “militia” are key components of the text. The applicants for concealed carry were not part of a militia, and the current court doesn’t seem to acknowledge the “well-regulated” piece exists at all.
With regard to abortion, the constitution guarantees us a right to privacy, which is closely linked to bodily autonomy. The argument being that there is constitutionally no legal way for the government to involve itself in your personal health decisions. There is an interesting ideological reversal here with regard to the recent vaccine debate with liberals arguing the government should be able to compel vaccination, and the conservatives against.
Here's an example: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/02/lastp...
As someone who works in a sensitive field, I would absolutely never run this risk. I'm grateful that my current employer invests in solid tooling to make the experience largely positive.