It supports many online services as well, but unfortunately no Prime Instant Video. I have yet to see a box that offers everything I want: Local and network media playback, Netflix, Prime.
However, I wish the WDTV had better specs and UI - it can be a little clunky.
I'm on the verge of doing the exact same thing. On that plan are you able to use any of that data for tethering or mobile hotspot? A customer service rep said you can use all of your "up to 5GB" 4G data for tethering if you want, but I found that a little hard to believe.
Tangent: How on earth do product blogs not have a link to their product page? Nowhere is there a link to feedly.com in their header or sidebar, I have to manually edit the URL. Ridiculous.
Even if Apple was the first company ever to have a disappearing scroll-bar on a mobile device, I'm amazed something like that can be patented. To me it seems like a common sense evolution when shrinking things down to mobile proportions.
"You know there isn't much screen real estate here, so lets get rid of the bar, and only show the scroll head when you are scrolling. Good idea!" Why should someone be allowed to patent that?
It's like the first website ever to say, "We really have a lot of menu items here... I know, let's group them into sub-menus that 'drop-down' when you mouse over them?" Boom, drop-down menus are now patented, pay up if you want to use them in your website. Sure there were drop-down file menus on computers before this, but I'm the first one ever to do it on a website.
Can someone explain why the two are nothing alike and I'm an idiot for feeling this way?
I started using Everything (http://www.voidtools.com/) to help mitigate XP's slow searching and still use it today, even with Win7's much improved search functionality.
Everything Search only indexes file names, so you can't search via date modified or anything like that, but it is super-fast and supports regular expressions. Need to find a word doc that begins with 'ca'? Just type '^ca.*\.docx?', instant results.
I'm irritated because it seems the only attention given to Win7 is critical/security fixes, while any non-critical bugs will be ignored and the answer will be to simply buy the next version of Windows if you want the problem to go away. IMO a lack of attention to detail and caring about your users.
I agree with the OP that all his examples were a poor use of no-reply addresses. My point is that they do serve a purpose sometimes - my example being notifications, reminders, and other inherently one-way messages.
If it is a message I am not expecting nor am I immediately aware of why it is being sent, then I think the reply-to address should be a real address capable of handing my response.
True, if it is a relatively small support operation. This would be harder to do with larger companies that had separate addresses for billing questions, service problems, troubleshooting, etc. If every outbound message had a singular live reply-to email address, then you'd need someone to sift through all those and route to the appropriate department.
I consider the no-reply address a courtesy to me to know that I won't end up writing a reply to an address that isn't monitored. Things like bank notifications and alerts are designed to be one-way communications, so the no-reply address makes sense. Usually the body or footer of the message contains the proper contact methods/addresses. It does not hurt my feelings to have to click on an email address within the message vs. clicking the 'reply' button in my client.
That being said, I agree that a no-reply address sends the wrong message for start-ups, welcome messages, signup confirmations, etc. I think they are good for recurring message that are inherently one-way, and when the user knows the preferred contact info for the company.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_Machines