HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

pffft8888

no profile record

Submissions

A community fork of Rust for “unrestricted use”

github.com
3 points·by pffft8888·3 lata temu·0 comments

RWKV RNN: Better than ChatGPT?

github.com
328 points·by pffft8888·3 lata temu·107 comments

Blackrock Creating a Back-Door CBDC

bpi.com
2 points·by pffft8888·3 lata temu·0 comments

comments

pffft8888
·3 lata temu·discuss
They can do this in people, too, not just LLMs.

Imagine the mistakes that can be made by changing one fact but not reconfiguring the whole network.

Thhese guys remind me of when I used to change EXEs in hex editors then notice "unrelated" weird glitches.
pffft8888
·3 lata temu·discuss
Feeling left out?
pffft8888
·3 lata temu·discuss
That's 66 bits of entropy. With a quantum computer having 66 logical (error corrected) qubits, the pass phrase can be cracked in under a day.

That's not too far off, maybe a few years before one is commercially available.
pffft8888
·3 lata temu·discuss
get it from the horse's mouth, as they say... instead of baselessly pontificating on HN and not understanding the diff between algorithm and implementation
pffft8888
·3 lata temu·discuss
"even if these attacks aren't feasible against current algorithms" lol, ok, if you say so....
pffft8888
·3 lata temu·discuss
2048 words in 6 positions is simply not enough entropy for the NSA's encryption cracking infrastructure. If it is worth it they'll crack it. The NSA does not use a single ASIC cracker.
pffft8888
·3 lata temu·discuss
not the algorithm. the various implementations of it. evidence? ask a friend.
pffft8888
·3 lata temu·discuss
Why would they have Suite A then?
pffft8888
·3 lata temu·discuss
You can't trust what sama says. Period. He's shown his willingness to deceive for gain. He deleted the codex model because it was better than the text model and only way to explain it is that by training on code instead of just text of human interactions the model develops stronger reasoning abilities (because of higher clarity around logic and higher signal to noise overall in the training data.) So he removed that so researchers don't catch on. Also, why 1 Trillion params is the limit? Why not 2 Trillion. He's been begging for regulations and trying to pull up the ladder behind him. Just really "street smart" thinking but I have not seen any elevated humanity serving thinking coming form him. He would not have taken $100M for a non-profit to do open source research only to bait-and-switch into for profit closed source sold to the highest bidder. Give me a break. Don't believe anything he says (well, use your brain, as he may mix truths and deceptions with the goal of deceiving his competitors... he's not out there to do a service for humanity... if he was, he would have kept it open and non-profit, not basically steal the funds of the non-profit to pocket $29B from it.) It's ridiclous.
pffft8888
·3 lata temu·discuss
The worst thing about HN (and it does reflect badly on YC as a whole, at least for me) is how they enable people to act in seemingly passive aggressive ways. Instead of stating disagreements, they downvote, and you'll never know why. Just pure crappy behavior. In this case, someone explained below that they downvoted because they don't agree that the article is propaganda and that it calls for less backdoors or something like that as if everything isn't backdoored already, one way or another.

Then you have stuff like BIP39 protecting people's money (cryptocurrency) that can be cracked for $350/hr on GPU rigs. Someone even wrote a how-to.

Current security makes it harder, but not sufficiently harder, to break into systems. I mean... HN crowd is probably high schoolers and non-tech people just out here to argue.
pffft8888
·3 lata temu·discuss
The propaganda against encryption is in full swing.

My expectation is that all NSA CNSA[1] encryption standards are backdoored at the implementation level (by the NSA who uses Suite A for its own communication and I suspect military communications outside of that in weapons systems that can fall into enemy hands)

I guess the propaganda is driven by FBI and law enforcement agencies.

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commercial_National_Security_A... 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSA_Suite_A_Cryptography
pffft8888
·3 lata temu·discuss
You just got validated. Does that mean you're desperate? or anxious? or even sick in the head?
pffft8888
·3 lata temu·discuss
But the person is complaining about people complaining. I find it ironic.
pffft8888
·3 lata temu·discuss
Says a person who is online...
pffft8888
·3 lata temu·discuss
I take that back I'm suyrprised. HN crowd is mostly very pedestrian.
pffft8888
·3 lata temu·discuss
Yes. I'm just surprised at the downvotes. Hmm. We're talking about jobs, right? Everyone's job is very much at risk unless people adapt to a P2P economy with humans and AIs in it, trading with and employing each other.
pffft8888
·3 lata temu·discuss
The sky is falling... etc. It is true, however, that AI is going to reduce a team of 10 to 1, regardless of what field they're in. One day soon we will see companies run by an AI employing umans for 1:1 sales only, until we become more used to being sold stuff by bots. We're wittnessing the birth of a new age, and people are talking about web developers.
pffft8888
·3 lata temu·discuss
Bitcoin is based against the wisdom that "all that glitters is not gold." It abuses the "shiny object" trigger in our animal brain. The minute it looks shiny, its price goes up, and vice versa.

It's become a way for people to manage their anxiety around the state of the economy, pumping money into Bitcoin whenever it looks shiny relative to the fiat currency, and getting out when it doesn't, or when it stops going up (no more shiny attraction.) You need a sustained campaign of lies and deception to keep polishing that turd, so to speak.

We're better off without it, but you can't take away some people's psychological safety blankie.
pffft8888
·3 lata temu·discuss
Altman is v2.0 of Zuckerberg, with 1000X more parameters.

I'm worried about v3.0
pffft8888
·3 lata temu·discuss
Weird coincidence, I tweeted roghly the same idea two weeks ago:

https://twitter.com/marcfawzi/status/1636115903959158785

Obviously, it's a no-brainer idea at a high level. The devil is in the details.