the problem being, most judges won't even allow it to be mentioned as an option. So the jurists have to know about it ahead of time and know their rights to use it without getting thrown in jail themselves.
actually, all it takes is high fat butter in your regular coffee (while taking the sugar out). You don't have to buy anything from him. Also, excess protein turns into sugar, so if ketones are raising your resting blood sugar, you may have another underlying metabolic or pancreatic issue.
nice to see that you apply said guidelines evenly. but hey - go ahead and let everyone down-vote because they simply disagree - which is AGAINST the guidelines...
As a Yankee, the one troubling issue that I saw was that there was really NO electoral representative government within the EU parliaments (plural). It was a completely 'appointed' bureaucracy, and therefore (IMO) the complete opposite of anything even resembling a democracy.
As important as trade is, it can not be allowed to overshadow the choices of leadership, or the ability of people to remove that leadership. Continuing in the EU would have been like (again, IMO) having the same president or prime minister for 50 years, with NO ability to vote them out, which sounds like 'dictatorship by committee'.
I was thinking this question is like:
"Can we all go Republican?"
"Can we all go Catholic?"
"Can we all go .Net?"
While the question can be asked, why would someone want to take choices away from billions of people? this article tries to justify taking choices away from people... I'm noticing a trend here...
Fanatic adherence to belief systems while not allowing others the leeway or freedom to follow their own without being hassled is a big part of what is bringing society down.
LOL, have you seen who the people are that are going on these rampages? seriously, have you looked at their political affiliations or are you just spouting your political views without checking facts?
so you're saying "innocent until proven guilty"? What a concept. Be careful though. That's considered subversion in some circles, depending on the topic.
so asking a question is now a 'down-votable' offense on HN? WTF people? either don't answer or point them in the direction of some research. Don't down-vote, you arrogant fucks.
the problem then would be that only the 'important' people would have guns. I don't see any politicians giving up their security details. I don't see Diane Feinstein or Chuck Schumer giving up their 'concealed carry' licenses. Its a classic "Do as I say, not as I do."
If they can carry in their overly restrictive states, why can't the electorate? don't they have the same rights? No? because political elitism.
...speaking of 'unhelpful' to the conversation, please explain what 'We' can do about it? Nothing. The fact is that CONgress actually legalized domestic propaganda (which is what this is).
'raising awareness' does nothing as the snowden incident showed us. 1984 is the SOP now.
see my comment on being the "World Police". This country supports and props up dictators all the time. Why should we pay for a war (with dollars and blood) in another country when we can't even help the homeless here?
You as a human being will make sure your children/family are fed first, before you give to someone else, right? How is that any different as a nation?
While I am no fan the POTUS' international policies, I am even less a fan of war or being the world police. These 51 'diplomats' are mid-level and all 'career' diplomats.
Civil war sucks, but sometimes, you have to let the people fight. Few, if any country in the world exists today because it's people wouldn't fight for it (take a hint, Iraq).
My senators are douchebags. They (almost purposefully) split on nearly every important vote, thereby saving the 'state' from being on the 'losing' side... never mind having a united front on anything...
that still makes no sense as far as 'intelligence' goes. First off, rural and urban birds have different overall diets. if you stick a french fry in front of a rural bird, it might not know its supposed to be 'food'. Same can be said with water-bugs and urban birds. there are too many factors to consider - though they could have and just not reported the specific metrics.
Then you must address the fact that SCOTUS is now adjudicating law based not on the law itself or precedents or logical reasoning, but how the individual judges personally feel the law should apply... which is why congress is hemming-and-hawing over it.
also, much like Soylent Green, companies are now 'people'...