My biggest peeve with macOS Tahoe is the App Launcher redesign.
It seems like a clear regression in usability. By moving from a high-density, full-screen experience to a constrained, scrolling window, they’ve increased the interaction cost for launching apps via the mouse. It feels like a 'unification tax. Sacrificing desktop utility to align with non-Desktop modalilties. Does anyone see a functional upside here, or is this purely aesthetic consistency?
My twins (in high school) and I are building an AI study buddy.The idea is simple. A peer-level “study friend” you can work alongside, ask questions, and stay on track with.
It’s not doing anything ChatGPT or Claude couldn’t do. The goal is packaging it into something that feels a high-schooler would actually want to use when they’re studying.
We are also using this as a weekly project to learn the abstract stuff. Product thinking, design, pricing, marketing, and how to turn a vague idea into something real. Each week the kids prioritize a feature, research it, write up the idea, and then we build (or cut) it together.
Our stack is Claude Code, TypeScript, React and it's hosted on Cloudflare Pages for frontend + Workers for API.
No login or credit card required to try this out. We welcome your feedback.
One way or other, the cat is out of the bag and there is no going back. Remember Napster. Even if Open AI/ChatGPT is taken down, however unlikely, there is no slowing down the innovation that is about to transform our lives. This moment in time feels like early 2000s when Web 1.0 became real to masses and suddenly everyone had a use for web. We are at precipice of the next big technology cycle, and this is showing all the classical symptoms of incumbents fighting the inevitable disruption
The American technology companies are looking increasingly vulnerable especially internationally. Tech companies are the new wave of American mega corporations. I wonder how the mega corporation of past managed to navigate these challenges? Did US government play any role in protecting the US companies? If so, what drove it, more business friendly Washington, more effective lobbying, or something else?
This is interesting new thinking coming from FTC. The whole concept of "dominant intermediaries" seems to focus on the likes of Apple, Google, Amazon, and Facebook. Can't wait to see how FTC takes this forward.
It’s not that simple. Twitter has business, operations, and employees in India. Twitter can choose to stop doing business in India. This decision will hurt both Twitter and Indian economy. It’s not in the interest of both parties to keep escalating.
Pressuring social media companies seems to an interesting developing trend. India and Russia both took actions against social media companies in the past few days. Florida passed local laws protecting politicians. Over the past 6 months Google, Facebook, Twitter, et al proved themselves to be competent in monitoring and banning unwanted content. I will not be surprised that each country will create laws and pressure the tech companies to comply. After all, the veneer of ToS compliance is a thin match against local laws. If a government can justify their actions in the local courts, the only options the tech companies have would be to either comply or leave the country. Even Apple chose compliance with the local laws in China. See - https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/17/technology/apple-china-ce...
This is why we as users should choose our platforms carefully. This spat between Roku and Google is ultimately all about $$$ generated with 'monetizing' our habits and data. Ad infested platforms like Roku will continually try and push for larger share of the pie. Whereas, Google will continue pushing for more data. They both will win. Win at our expense. Not thanks, I would rather stay with my Apple TV and have a modicum of control over my privacy, even though it's more expensive piece of hardware to buy.
Camp Century was nuclear power research base in Greenland and was a cover-up for a Project Iceworm whose end goal was to install a vast network of nuclear missile launch sites under the Greenland ice sheet. This video shows the audacity of this project in 1960 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28NYczAuXl4). It was ultimately abandoned as ice conditions were not as stable as initially projected. Nuclear waste and Biohazard created by this site has become an environmental concern with the melting of the ice sheet.
Compare and contrast the executive compensation to the weakening power of employee unions. In the past executives needed to be diligent about how executive compensation would affect union negotiations. It would be very hard to squeeze unions while dramatically increasing executive compensation. With weakened labor unions, there is no need to maintain the curtain of equity of treatment of labor vs executives.
The Economist published article in this week's edition contrasting the rise of the current left/right fervor to relative decline of the religious fervor. The accompanying image captures this really well - https://www.economist.com/img/b/1000/563/90/sites/default/fi....
It’s inspiring to see that Buffett and Munger remain so wonderfully optimistic about the future of the US even when both are 90+ in the current sociopolitical environment. Reading this letter certainly lifted my spirit and put me in a different mood.
Anti trust case against Apple in the US made sense due to Apple's dominance in both the share of users and the share of the app store revenue. EU may not be as clearcut.
This news article does not mention anything about the basis for antitrust. Is it the marketshare of iOS phone users or it is the revenue. Seems like iOS marketshare as defined by the number of users is about 20%, revenue share should be higher.
Terms of service cannot supersede local laws. If Twitter wants to do business in a country, they need to comply. Twitter can choose to give up ad revenue and reach. Turkish government may have bad motive. However, democratic governments around the world can and should regulate social media in their countries per the local laws.
The comparison page just went up. Series 6 has both blood oxygen and ECG that SE does not. I would prefer Series 6 over SE. https://www.apple.com/watch/compare/
