redant · HackerTrans

This argument is false. Google contributed the protocol to IETF. Where the competitors introduced a lot of incompatible changes, which Google then implemented. The blog post is literally Google's announcement that they are moving to that public standard.

redant

6 lat temudiscuss

You are right.

redant

6 lat temudiscuss

Only the v0.9 satellites launched on 24 May 2019 did not have interlink. All the satellites after that did have interlink.

redant

9 lat temudiscuss

@doctoring Do you think that those 5 pharma companies would be interested in the service that would take care of data collection and alerting patient/911? If it is possible I would like to talk to you about this and other ideas. Could you contact me at redant409[at}gmail.com?

redant

9 lat temudiscuss

Are you talking about unmanned mission? Because he specifically mentioned crewed mission.

redant

9 lat temudiscuss

The author and some comments tend to confuse skills, success, and intelligence. I think the author describes successful and skillful software engineers who are far from being highly intelligent. It just happened that their skills of constructing program is highly valuable in the current market conditions. Which feeds their arrogance and leads to all kinds of ugly consequences. The hardware engineers of the 20-th century had the same issues. The main hero of the movie Falling Down is an excellent example of such guy.

redant

9 lat temudiscuss

Could you provide an algorithm for deciding how many children to have? Then could you apply it to an average American family in 1950? I bet that any algorithm would tell them 'Are you crazy to even consider having kids? You just witnessed a global war that took tens of millions of lives. The world economy is still anemic. And the world is on the cusp of the nuclear war.' And every algorithm will be proven wrong by the baby-boomers generation. I think your argument is a suggestion to over-rationalize in the absence of information. Exactly what the article is describing.