HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

riccomini

no profile record

Submissions

Distributed Compaction in SlateDb

ryandielhenn.github.io
2 points·by riccomini·29 dni temu·0 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by riccomini·2 miesiące temu·0 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by riccomini·3 miesiące temu·0 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by riccomini·3 miesiące temu·0 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by riccomini·3 miesiące temu·0 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by riccomini·3 miesiące temu·0 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by riccomini·3 miesiące temu·0 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by riccomini·3 miesiące temu·0 comments

Something Is Happening

rng.md
3 points·by riccomini·3 miesiące temu·0 comments

MCP Server Could Have Been a JSON File

materializedview.io
4 points·by riccomini·10 miesięcy temu·1 comments

Show HN: ZeroFS: The S3FS that does not suck

github.com
10 points·by riccomini·w zeszłym roku·0 comments

Kafka: The End of the Beginning

materializedview.io
2 points·by riccomini·w zeszłym roku·0 comments

Everything You Need to Know About Incremental View Maintenance

materializedview.io
9 points·by riccomini·w zeszłym roku·6 comments

The Bond Market at the 5% Threshold

dataandpolitics.net
19 points·by riccomini·w zeszłym roku·1 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by riccomini·w zeszłym roku·0 comments

AI IDEs Need Moats

materializedview.io
2 points·by riccomini·w zeszłym roku·0 comments

Comparing Apache, CNCF, and Commonhaus

cnr.sh
2 points·by riccomini·w zeszłym roku·0 comments

Show HN: A static site generator toolkit written in Python

github.com
2 points·by riccomini·w zeszłym roku·0 comments

S3 Is the New SFTP

materializedview.io
1 points·by riccomini·2 lata temu·0 comments

Slatedb/Clean_slate.md

github.com
1 points·by riccomini·2 lata temu·0 comments

comments

riccomini
·w zeszłym roku·discuss
DD supports lattices that allow it to compute at multiple points in time simultaneously. As I understand it, DBSP limits time to one diff at a time. Lalith can correct me if I’m off base on this. :)
riccomini
·2 lata temu·discuss
Great question! We started out with the design you described--WAL as L0. But we found that there's a bit of a tension between wanting to have L0 SSTs be larger (and having fewer of them) to reduce metadata size, while we wanted to keep WAL SSTs small and frequent (to reduce async/await latency).

Basically, we wanted to have WAL writes go on the order of milliseconds, but we wanted L0 SSTs to be larger since they actually service reads.

The architecture page has more detail if you haven't found it yet:

https://slatedb.io/docs/architecture