None of your points have anything to do with my response. Moving the goalposts shows that you aren't capable of thinking clearly about the issue and your ad hominems speak even less about your character.
The energy was going to waste, a heritage site was preserved, no co2 was released, they were unable to sell the power to the grid.
Keep raging at windmills that generate 0.1% of global emissions if it makes you feel like a hero. It won't solve anything.
> Despite getting the plant back to full power, there's not a lot of profit in running a plant that still uses all of the original 1800s machinery. That's why some of the plant's energy is now being used to produce bitcoin.
Mining bitcoin will allow a threatened landmark to survive through used hardware and clean energy.
If there is a primary flaw, it's that it can't be resized. If you are sufficiently motivated to become more active, the ring becomes too loose over time.
Not the worst problem, but it ends up in caught in the drain more than I'd like.
Source?