HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

shadowfaxRodeo

no profile record

Submissions

Line length revisited: following the research

designregression.com
2 points·by shadowfaxRodeo·5 lat temu·0 comments

Check if your bank is funding the fossil fuel industry

bank.green
25 points·by shadowfaxRodeo·5 lat temu·17 comments

The carbon footprint of streaming video: fact-checking the headlines

iea.org
2 points·by shadowfaxRodeo·5 lat temu·1 comments

Sustainable web design

sustainablewebdesign.org
59 points·by shadowfaxRodeo·5 lat temu·48 comments

What Does My Site Cost?

whatdoesmysitecost.com
378 points·by shadowfaxRodeo·5 lat temu·295 comments

Sapolsky Lecture on Depression

youtube.com
2 points·by shadowfaxRodeo·5 lat temu·0 comments

Show HN: Not Another Gradient Generator

doodad.dev
18 points·by shadowfaxRodeo·5 lat temu·2 comments

Threatened pandemics and laboratory escapes: Self-fulfilling prophecies (2014)

thebulletin.org
1 points·by shadowfaxRodeo·5 lat temu·0 comments

Ask HN: How can I learn to be a cyber security expert?

20 points·by shadowfaxRodeo·5 lat temu·11 comments

Ask HN: Do you block JavaScript? why?

14 points·by shadowfaxRodeo·5 lat temu·23 comments

comments

shadowfaxRodeo
·5 lat temu·discuss
It’s not dangerous?! Somebody tell the nuclear power companies. They’ll save so much money on security and safety. They could have a side hustle doing tours for school kids.

Of course it’s safe! This explains why Fukushima has such a thriving beach front community — and why three-mile island is such a tourist hot spot.

I guess that means dirty bombs aren’t dangerous? I guess nuclear weapons aren’t dangerous either!! Someone tell the CND, they’ve been wasting all their time protesting.

Wait, this is huge, the biggest conspiracy of all time. what about Hiroshima and Nagasaki, they must be in on it too. Did they fake it?! Was the Cuban missile crisis an inside job? Is the Bikini atoll an advertising ploy for two-piece swimwear?

Does e=mc^2 or are Oppenheimer and Einstein sipping mojitos in the Bermuda Triangle with Elvis and Tupac?
shadowfaxRodeo
·5 lat temu·discuss
> That doesn't seem to add anything to the discussion. I don't know what you're getting at.

I'm explaining why I'm against building nuclear power plants — it's a very simple point really:

- Do nuclear power plants require stability to be safe?

- Is the world becoming more or less stable?

All the other stuff sounds like a conspiracy theory.
shadowfaxRodeo
·5 lat temu·discuss
You could make the exact same argument about nuclear energy. The same promises were made, and it has failed to deliver.

It doesn't address the main issue of nuclear — it's incredibly dangerous. For nuclear to be safe you need human security, human experts, funding, you need to not have tsunamis, earthquakes, pandemics, wars, terrorism, economic collapse.

That's not a promise nuclear can make — especially given that we've almost certaintly have passed tipping points that will make unrest and extreme weather likely.

At this point it's not about stopping the climate crisis, it's about limiting the damage, and preparing society for the inevitable consequences.
shadowfaxRodeo
·5 lat temu·discuss
If you think there's no prospect of coal consumption going down, then we're headed for global calamity.

Knowing that it's a likely scenario that the world becomes wildly unpredictable, it's not responsible to also build nuclear reactors that require stability and maintenance to be safe.
shadowfaxRodeo
·5 lat temu·discuss
I don’t think you’ll find many anti-nuclear people on HN that are also pro-fossil-fuel.

It’s a false choice, we can choose to not use fossil fuels, and decrease the risk of nuclear meltdowns and dirty bombs at the same time.
shadowfaxRodeo
·5 lat temu·discuss
This is a false choice.

As the world gets more unstable due to climate change — an increased risk on pandemics, civil unrest, extreme weather events — do we really want abandoned nuclear power stations added to the mix?

So, don’t do either. use way less energy, rely on renewables and batteries for the rest.
shadowfaxRodeo
·5 lat temu·discuss
Because it doesn’t collect personal data to sell to advertisers.
shadowfaxRodeo
·5 lat temu·discuss
This is an excellent point.

I’m no influencer, but i do have a big family and lots of very close friends. I’m very lucky.

Many people are isolated and struggle to make and maintain friendships — especially over the last year. They don’t have the luxury of being able to take a stand.
shadowfaxRodeo
·5 lat temu·discuss
Which messaging app do you think most people would join… one with nobody else using it, or one with everyone else using?
shadowfaxRodeo
·5 lat temu·discuss
My issue is with Facebook, not with the network effect itself. Happy to use the network effect to get people off Facebook.
shadowfaxRodeo
·5 lat temu·discuss
Understandably, people who don’t use WhatsApp, don’t think it’s weird that other people don’t use WhatsApp.

People who do have WhatsApp, probably have it, because most of the people they know have it.
shadowfaxRodeo
·5 lat temu·discuss
I got rid of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp about 4 years ago. Facebook and Instagram was easy, but people who have WhatsApp really think you’re weird for not having it.

Deleting WhatsApp, while annoying for me personally, has resulted in many people I know joining Signal or Telegram — the network effect can be broken by being belligerent.

If you don’t want to have a conversation about why you deleted WhatsApp, simply say it’s a moral issue, nobody wants to know.
shadowfaxRodeo
·5 lat temu·discuss
I've tried it out, I'm still getting smaller AVIF files with dithering. Not like the saving you get by using a dithered png instead of a jpeg.

Depends on a lot of factors. You can keep turning the quality down on avif and get it lower than a dithered image. At some point I'd prefer the crispness of a dithered image over a blurry full color image.

Also, avif seems to do a really good job of lossy compression on dithered images.
shadowfaxRodeo
·5 lat temu·discuss
But you can also use a dithered AVIF — and save even more.
shadowfaxRodeo
·5 lat temu·discuss
But have you tried dithering AND using modern image formats?
shadowfaxRodeo
·5 lat temu·discuss
Hi there author of the article here, I did a lot of testing when I wrote the article, and even made a tool for dithering.

https://doodad.dev/dither-me-this/

It completely depends on what kind of dithering you do — ordered dithering with a small color palette will give you a much smaller file size than a full color jpeg.

WebP and AVIF also support lossless compression and can be used for even smaller file sizes using dithering.
shadowfaxRodeo
·5 lat temu·discuss
If you try to use lossy compression on a dithered image it will increase the file size. Using dithering and saving in a compressed lossless format will have drastically different results.
shadowfaxRodeo
·5 lat temu·discuss
I wrote that previous comment before I fully understood the new specification. I'm still not entirely sure, but it looks like you're right.

I thought the rules were static, I see now they can be updated dynamically — which works perfectly for my use case.
shadowfaxRodeo
·5 lat temu·discuss
I have a firefox version, and a safari one in the works. It has about 50 users on firefox and 1500 on chrome.

It works a bit differently to most content blockers, you can take a look here if you're interested:

https://prodtodolist.com

Anyway, the whole point is to allow people to get out of addictive loops, to take control of how they use the web, and most people aren't that tech savvy — they deserve to not be addicted to facebook too.
shadowfaxRodeo
·5 lat temu·discuss
Removing webRequest's blocking will completely destroy my web extension.

It helps people get work done by blocking website's they're addicted to.

I've just started out on a new version, not sure what to do.