Spoken like a person who does not consider the sheer volume Twitter (and companies like it) have to deal with.
The company would go bankrupt if they hired enough people to handle all of the manual posts. They also can't just leave abusive images up... so this is the compromise.
Except fact is not provocative at all. They were objective with their answer and did not respond in a way that was derogatory nor mean spirited. They didn't even mention their opinion on religion, just responded "No, here would be the sequence of things". That's not even critical.
You trying to weaponize the guidelines is an abuse of the community and against the spirit and purpose of the rules.
The company would go bankrupt if they hired enough people to handle all of the manual posts. They also can't just leave abusive images up... so this is the compromise.