thomzane · HackerTrans

56 minut temudiscuss

I would not have as big of a problem with it if it was a transparent arrangement that the app is free of cost, but the Internet connection would be shared with customers of RoboVPN. The issue is that the often invisible arrangement is not obvious and likely breaks the terms of service with the Internet Service Provider. If the user was intentionally running a TOR node, I would not have a problem with it. The current reality of it is absolutely unethical and breaking the Internet as we know it.

thomzane

1 godzinę temudiscuss

You could configure reaction to add and remove `ip route` commands in that format.

thomzane

9 godzin temudiscuss

This monetization scheme benefits the botnet controller and the developer who added the SDK and not the user who likely did not realize they signed up to become an exit node.

thomzane

9 godzin temudiscuss

The difference between fail2ban and reaction is performance. If you are not hitting the ceiling of fail2ban, then you may not need reaction.

Do you have a blog post about your automated fail2ban rule generation?

thomzane

9 godzin temudiscuss

iptables has been mostly a wrapper for nftables for some time now. The choice of iptables + ipset with reaction is the difference in their configuration. Compare restart performance between the ipset and nftables example configurations with lists of greater than 1 million IPs.

thomzane

9 godzin temudiscuss

The patrons page is updated regularly.

comments