Do you an idea of how well these models perform on set theory problems or more niche fields in mathematics? So the model would have to both understand a paper that’s not in its training data, and use this to write proofs.
Very Apple-like marketing. No comparisons to other companies’ models, only to previous version of ChatGPT. Lots of phrases like “this is our best model yet”.
Anthropic's two demands are:
1. No domestic mass surveillance
2. No autonomous killing
I'm wondering if 2. was added simply to justify them not cooperating. It's a lot easier to defend 1. + 2. than just 1.
If in the future they do decide to cooperate with the DoW, they could settle on doing only mass surveillance, but no autonomous killings. This would be presented as a victory for both parties since they both partially get what they wanted, even though autonomous killing was never really on the table for either of them. Which is a big if given the current administration.
Just opened my Whatsapp settings and "Third-party chat requests" is on by default (From the Netherlands). Although to actually receive messages you do have to activate this feature.
Tools like GPTzero are incredibly unreliable. Me and plently of my colleagues often get our writing flagged as 100% AI by these tools, when no AI was used.
Find a new dentist. Nicotine pouches are incredibly bad for oral health. Huge risk of oral cancer. And it’ll make your gums recline, exposing your nerves (this hurts). Also nicotine itself is quite bad for you to begin with (cardiovascular health, anxiety, etc).
Sure snus is better than smoking, but that’s just because most things are better than smoking.
Curious to see it in action. Gemini 2.5 has already been very impressive as a study buddy for courses like set theory, information theory, and automata.
Although I’m always a bit skeptical of these benchmarks. Seems quite unlikely that all of the questions remain out of their training data.
And Sonnet is again better than Opus. I’d love to see simultaneous release dates for Sonnet and Opus one day. Just so that Opus is always better than Sonnet
Just a few months ago people were still talking about exponential progress.
The fact that we’re already going for just linear progress is not a good sign