wootland · HackerTrans

3 lata temudiscuss

It doesn't make sense because the biggest advantage to WFH is that people can live in a lower cost of living city (and companies can hire the best talent globally). Forcing people into the office even once a month means you're tied to the real estate market next to the office.

wootland

3 lata temudiscuss

> it’s been known remote workers don’t perform as well for as long as I’ve been in the industry.

It most certainly is not "known". I've managed remote teams, I've managed in-office teams and I've managed the same people in both scenarios. At no time was the office advantageous to innovation. Quite the opposite, it's a soul suck and once you free people to work how they are comfortable, their creativity will skyrocket.

wootland

3 lata temudiscuss

His ideology and distrust is propagated down the managerial ranks. It's an entire culture built on distrust and exploitation.

wootland

3 lata temudiscuss

> our hypothesis is that it is still easier to build trust in person

Nothing builds trust like callously laying off tens of thousands of people over multiple rounds of layoffs! Want a trustworthy environment? Earn it. Really though when he says "build trust" what he means is that he (Zuck) does not trust his employees unless he can see them.

comments