I realize front end frameworks can be in the language of the trophy awards for solving a real consumer's "temporary endeavor undertaken to produce a unique product, service or result: actually a helplessly complicated system of activating the end result, which also from Fundamental of Project Management book, is "a headless chicken project" before the developers take enough "aftercare" to realize all has been ended and the honey room is next (human resources).
This is of course for CM0 type of whatever development though that may be in carriage of more advanced software life cycle systems. I tried some Vue dot js, I got some Angular dot js, I saw Angular dot whatever is difference positive. I read JS survey reports and of course always am super diligent about understanding Stack Overflow surveys of developers.
I think any particular perspective on the end results tends to be from the myopia of the skillist's perspective (to use confederal type of language instead of under-squiggley-tells-me federal non-adverbial BE that IBE can understand, without massive disassembly efforts on the part of the communication triangle (most direct, least direct, something else).
This is sort of like unpunctuated scriptures being upgrade to punctuated before being universalized after failed attempts to understand the Hegelian master/slave "golden" pretend morality (not to be hypercritical about "geeks" jargon file meaning as someone who knows chickens can be engineering to be pretty amazing and basically do a 50 yard dash in amazing pirouettes like dolphins released from old Navy, Pavlov sacristen-blasphemer, padawan of Orloff, yards that aren't still supposed to be around).
I mean it is Bacchanalia day and all, so Festivus!
React is great, Vue is great, conditional reflexology is trump over nonreflexive thinking attempts, it is all good to Pathology Excellent Rubbish Lister (PERL, red squiggle word kill count = 0). Ok front door 89 hz beep went off. I'm over my trolling limit. Be well, program in popular script-y.
I used to know someone who claimed he thought he had met someone who knew classified information about nuclear bombardment being lied about to the lay public. (good) Neutron bombs can cleanly sweep human level bipeds but that problem is explored also in the "Gant" (not sure if available in your area) science fiction about the food chain being linked to impossible to eliminate critical nexuses of worm stuff under the ground. These would also get hit by a good neutron bomb, depending on burst down effect. Anyway, I used to have a good close friend who possibly on face recall who had a great hobby of photographing the other people exploring abandoned mining towns. Neat scrapbooks are like Old People Magic, kind of High Weird. Not every scrapbook is selected for the same hot valence either. Roadside Picnic got turned into a mythological video game but is also a wonderful movie and then also there's supposed to be the original book itself. Not all asylee in quiet American have the same disposition but there may be different wonderful tapeworms inside them training their lack of reaction to supposed reactional prevarication.
I am interpreting the question as being: "What was my greatest pleasure reading experience in 2018?" Thus my answer is: Nimoy, Leonard: I Am Not Spock (1975). Since it contains the greatest pleasurable experience of the most influential TV scientist of our times, even when he didn't have green blood -- his time as Tevya in Fiddler of the Roof when the cast presented him with awards for his service and they ate a cast dinner together. Thus he received the greatest emotional outlet of his quite in-held life.
I have an adjectival reply which is less based in fact but more in practical maxim. One problem with the late stage of a general purpose language may be described by one instructor's phrase as "programming zoo." Thus people tend to keep to the usual described animals but then formerly binary dynamic linked libraries need to be opened up to be cured and then the zoos sort of super-zoo thus become ooze. So it is true. (p) There is no real way to gate a general purpose programming language of industrial application for the rules of commerce are too adaptive. Thus version restriction by compiler is one method to reduce intellectual orthogonal complexity, in sense of bizarre constructs going fourth wall against each other and paralyzing the human analyst.
The terms of immediacy are a great reminder of the importance of the 97 % of nonverbal context. Consider for example, the great American classic essay from Harvard Business Review "How to Run a Meeting" (1976, first published.)
I only have a few minor comments. (p)
(p)
There is a joke about nuts. I am have started reading the biography of the second greatest scientist of the previous millennium. He would tell jokes to less peons to occupy their time. Sort of like the kid at the $5 poker tournament who keeps asking why? How? When? What? Where? But the turn of action to be competently successful is supposed to be Who, What, When, Where? Why? How?
Tangential, I did some sort of in spirit of Agile terminology a "mob" writing of a Common Source book (this vocabulary word seems to be deficient in my "W" sense of cyber-net). This was a promise to someone else's deceased parent in the Dead Fathers Club that I would write a book in their honour (spelling susp.).
So I would hear quiet words of top elf herders when I made mistakes. I won't link to it, since I wanted to include some words that have become as copyright to claim.
(That is, in common style of old singular sense of farmers almanacs, people would write in their own book of learnings (spelling susp.). This home notebook (paper) would then record of personally significant captures of word passages learned, this then being the definition of a Common Source book with also lookup to cite reference. However people such as Emerson (many "mistooks") or Ursula K LeGuin, Lathe of Heaven (the "mistook" being a grant of charter to her wisdom), or as in common error of translation of Sufi mysticism to secular preachings of Universalist atheists, you know the one it's in the Nonviolent Communication Training Course). Be well.
From my homepage: Some nonfiction books that I've read during 2018. I try to reduce my thoughts to the logline style in sense of Save the Cat: The Last Screenwriting Book You Will Ever Read. A logline is a single sentence describing a work with a twist of irony after a comma.
- Mechner, Jordan: The Making of Prince of Persia: Journals 1985 - 1993 (2011).
My remarks: I read his previous book about developing Karateka, in one sitting.
- Nadella, Satya: Hit Refresh: The Quest to Rediscover Microsoft's Soul and Imagine a Better Future for Everyone. My remarks: I didn't expect the story that he opened with.
- Edited by Rohde, Peter: The Diary of Soren Kierkengaard (1960). Lived 1813-1855. The blurb on the back cover: "Jean-Paul Sarte's philosophy of existentialism is based on his thinking."
- Kai Bird; Martin Sherwin: American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J Robert Oppenheimer. My remarks: I wanted to know what was behind him quoting the Gita. This book took me several years to read but delivered on my curiousity about that.
- Nimoy, Leonard: I Am Not Spock (1975). My remarks: So if you consider yourself a Vulcan, it may suprise you to learn that Nimoy cried every weekend to let out the emotions he held inside during the week of acting.
- David Lipsky: Although of Course You End Up Becoming Yourself: A Road Trip With David Foster Wallace (2010). My remarks: I only care for the nonfiction writings of DFW. He had a sad end. It is a good read for writers. Consider the "snow" of his middle name as well.
- Scott, Robert Falcon: Scott's Last Expedition: The Journals (called as unabridged). Personal: This makes me want to travel to Iceland, to be honest.
- Foer, Joshua: Moonwalking with Einstein: The Art and Science of Remembering Everything (2011). My remarks: A journalist wanted to document the competitive memory subculture and then won the American championship. It was a more comprehensive survey of memory than I'd expected.
- Buford, Bill: Among the Thugs (1990). My remarks: I originally read this book for contemporary understanding since I had read that far right parties in Europe used futball hooligans as a base population to draw from. Susan Sontag underwhelmingly calls ecstatic experiences "flair." The fact that Buford quoted her twice means I am reading her stuff as well.
- Wright, Evan: Generation Kill. Courtesy of radio: Dave Ramsey show has as a common quote, "Pay your student loans or you will be damned, dead, or in Iraq."
- Funder, Anna: Stasiland: Stories from Behind the Berlin Wall (2002). My remarks: A movie on this topic is "The Lives of Others."
- Fisher, Michael: A History of India. (Great Courses)
- Ferris, Tim: Summary: The 4-Hour Workweek (2018). My remarks: This is an amazing book!
- Rosenberg, Marshall: The Nonviolent Communication Training Course (2006). My remarks: This one was pretty interesting. I was also reminded of Getting to Yes and CBT theory.
- Rogers, Fred: The World According to Mister Rogers: Important Things to Remember (2003). My remarks: I read this in memory of him after his passing. He considered his work a ministry.
- Yalom, Irvin: Love's Executioner and Other Tales of Psychotherapy (1989). My remarks: What it says on the tin.
- Blank, Dan: Soccer IQ: Things That Smart Players Do, Vol. 1 (2012). Amazon.com: #1 Best Seller in Soccer.
- Shapiro, Cythina: Corporate Confidential (2005). My remarks: Temple Grandin is someone who claims institutional logic follows its own rules. This Shapiro book has an explanation of the hidden scene behind the human resources curtain.
- Harari, Yuval: Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. My remarks: Seemed kind of blank to me.
- Tyson, Neil: Astrophysics for People in a Hurry. My remarks: A better source for basic physics understanding might be Einstein's popular account of GR. But thinking about relativistic light cones takes more time.
This is of course for CM0 type of whatever development though that may be in carriage of more advanced software life cycle systems. I tried some Vue dot js, I got some Angular dot js, I saw Angular dot whatever is difference positive. I read JS survey reports and of course always am super diligent about understanding Stack Overflow surveys of developers.
I think any particular perspective on the end results tends to be from the myopia of the skillist's perspective (to use confederal type of language instead of under-squiggley-tells-me federal non-adverbial BE that IBE can understand, without massive disassembly efforts on the part of the communication triangle (most direct, least direct, something else).
This is sort of like unpunctuated scriptures being upgrade to punctuated before being universalized after failed attempts to understand the Hegelian master/slave "golden" pretend morality (not to be hypercritical about "geeks" jargon file meaning as someone who knows chickens can be engineering to be pretty amazing and basically do a 50 yard dash in amazing pirouettes like dolphins released from old Navy, Pavlov sacristen-blasphemer, padawan of Orloff, yards that aren't still supposed to be around).
I mean it is Bacchanalia day and all, so Festivus!
React is great, Vue is great, conditional reflexology is trump over nonreflexive thinking attempts, it is all good to Pathology Excellent Rubbish Lister (PERL, red squiggle word kill count = 0). Ok front door 89 hz beep went off. I'm over my trolling limit. Be well, program in popular script-y.