HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

yumong

no profile record

comments

yumong
·2 lata temu·discuss
I'm aware that that's the theory.

But if it's really promising and ready and I care enough then I'll notice anyway.
yumong
·2 lata temu·discuss
I'm still trying to wrap my head around what this tool is achieving. Running filters on many files? Does this mean that your business dies if the original tool gains the ability (and nice GUI) to run batch jobs on its own?
yumong
·2 lata temu·discuss
Never in my life have I signed up on a waitlist. And nobody else I know ever has. I have enough spam in my inbox, why actively invite more?
yumong
·2 lata temu·discuss
[flagged]
yumong
·2 lata temu·discuss
And Second Life and Myspace.
yumong
·2 lata temu·discuss
Stephen Wolfram pushes this to the extreme.

Surprised that nobody mentioned him yet.
yumong
·2 lata temu·discuss
From an evolutionary perspective, wouldn't we expect to have developed a way to "reset" parts of our brain then?
yumong
·2 lata temu·discuss
Do we have aby indication that that's true? They are trying (and apparently succeeded) to sell something that's quite obviously fake. Whatever else they claim should be viewed in the light of that lie.
yumong
·2 lata temu·discuss
I recommend Lex Friedman's podcast's episode with Matthew Cox.
yumong
·2 lata temu·discuss
From somebody who paid more than that 20 years ago?
yumong
·2 lata temu·discuss
The assumption was that a trusted third party exists. Since you trust it, by definition, you can contact it to confirm authenticity of the certificate.
yumong
·2 lata temu·discuss
They bought it for 3000 DM and then sell it for less than half that price over 20 years later?
yumong
·2 lata temu·discuss
I'd also ask how come a single binder would suffice for 10 years of bills.
yumong
·2 lata temu·discuss
And the locally used abbreviation for the currency at the time was DM, not DEM.

For close to $1000, a little bit of effort is not unexpected.

(Also, why assume this was a guy?)
yumong
·2 lata temu·discuss
"x% chance dying of the flu" has two vastly different meanings.

"If you die, then the cause of death is to 2.5% the flu" is one meaning. Likely close to correct.

"With 2.5% you will die this year a death caused by the flu" is another. Unlikely to be correct.
yumong
·2 lata temu·discuss
[dead]