Show HN: I made a cloud editor/IDE(webtigerteam.com)
webtigerteam.com
Show HN: I made a cloud editor/IDE
https://www.webtigerteam.com/editor/
9 comments
Seems powerful but it's ugly IMO and very difficult to use UX-wise. I love the idea, but the interface makes it much more difficult to use.
I acknowledge this will be a problem for user on-boarding. The editor is designed for repeated and extended use, and assumes you will use keyboard shortcuts instead of menu/widgets. I would love to get some ideas how a perfect first-time experience should be like. Or things you are looking for in an editor. Should features have dedicated on-screen buttons/icons !? I've been thinking of maybe adding a dashboard with cool looking graphs showing website visitors, etc, to make it look more attractive ...
I've now made a dark theme!
demo: https://webide.se/?darkTheme
Is this any better ?
It will automatically activate on Macbooks when running dark theme. But on other platforms you will have to append the query string.
demo: https://webide.se/?darkTheme
Is this any better ?
It will automatically activate on Macbooks when running dark theme. But on other platforms you will have to append the query string.
You should partnership with a good web designer.
You can Ace https://ace.c9.io/ for editor.
Idea is powerful, You can improve the design a lot.
You can Ace https://ace.c9.io/ for editor.
Idea is powerful, You can improve the design a lot.
It already got an editor, in fact it's only and editor/IDE, and it just so happens that it's also possible to run it as a "cloud" IDE due to it having a separate back-end and front-end.
Do you have any ideas on how to improve the design, more then partner with a designer =) For example, would it help if you did not get right into the editor, that you got into a dashboard first, with graphs and other "bling bling", and had to click on a file/somewhere in order to get into the code editor !?
Do you have any ideas on how to improve the design, more then partner with a designer =) For example, would it help if you did not get right into the editor, that you got into a dashboard first, with graphs and other "bling bling", and had to click on a file/somewhere in order to get into the code editor !?
I wonder if that site is made using the editor?
If so it isn't a super great advertisement for itself due to invalid html
If so it isn't a super great advertisement for itself due to invalid html
Sorry about that. And thanks for the feedback. What browser are you using ?
Personally I do not like editors that nag me about "invalid" HTML, when most browsers can render the page perfectly well even if it's missing a title element or you screwed up the doctype. A HTML validator should be straightforward to implement though if you consider it a must have feature.
The editor however has semantic coloring and indentation, which should make some errors obvious, such as unclosed html tags.
Personally I do not like editors that nag me about "invalid" HTML, when most browsers can render the page perfectly well even if it's missing a title element or you screwed up the doctype. A HTML validator should be straightforward to implement though if you consider it a must have feature.
The editor however has semantic coloring and indentation, which should make some errors obvious, such as unclosed html tags.