Should we create (yet) a new Twitter?
3 comments
>My take is that a social media used for critical information at the scale of Twitter should be managed by a non-profit organization whose goal is to create, scale and maintain the platform from a technical standpoint, but also to moderate its content by creating a committee composed by people from around the world, representative of all the users of the service, who would be entitled to edict its rules.
Or, better not to have one entity monopolizing all users data, news, influence, and list goes on. Back in the day before social media, forums existed, each was specialized in a niche, politics, sure, you have that, oh you are interested in sports cars!? Great, have that forum, and so one. The good part is, we are getting to a full circle now and people realized (hopefully at least after the reality slaps from twitter/reddit) that’s better to have it the old way, forums, federated nodes, instances, you name it, that way it will prevent similar scenarios like Twitter one, where you make a social media, get crazy popular, then some rich dude buy it, rinse and repeat.
So, I’m happy that mastodon (or similar) are taking over slowly, I’m also happy to see people aren’t fixated on twitter/Reddit as before, and I don’t think making a new “twitter” will bring back the old ways, I don’t think they are getting back ever, the generation who populated twitter/Reddit are the same who did it back in forums and they are leaving traditional social media, and the new generation have an attention span of a gold fish so platforms like tiktok are more appealing.
Or, better not to have one entity monopolizing all users data, news, influence, and list goes on. Back in the day before social media, forums existed, each was specialized in a niche, politics, sure, you have that, oh you are interested in sports cars!? Great, have that forum, and so one. The good part is, we are getting to a full circle now and people realized (hopefully at least after the reality slaps from twitter/reddit) that’s better to have it the old way, forums, federated nodes, instances, you name it, that way it will prevent similar scenarios like Twitter one, where you make a social media, get crazy popular, then some rich dude buy it, rinse and repeat.
So, I’m happy that mastodon (or similar) are taking over slowly, I’m also happy to see people aren’t fixated on twitter/Reddit as before, and I don’t think making a new “twitter” will bring back the old ways, I don’t think they are getting back ever, the generation who populated twitter/Reddit are the same who did it back in forums and they are leaving traditional social media, and the new generation have an attention span of a gold fish so platforms like tiktok are more appealing.
I get that you say that you want this to be donation-driven, but people aren't going to donate to a social media platform unless it represents a community that is valuable to the people who are a part of it. Wikipedia receives donations because hosting the world's largest repository of community-driven information is valuable to all kinds of people. And governments probably won't want to fund a social media site unless they get some kind of access to the data behind it
It would be nice to have more enthusiast-run online forums that focused around building communities rather than corporate social media sites that are focused on trying to become the next big thing
It would be nice to have more enthusiast-run online forums that focused around building communities rather than corporate social media sites that are focused on trying to become the next big thing
We have enough Twitters. The problem is fragmentation of the network, and adding more won't help that.
Until Elon, I didn’t really have a point of view on how the platform was managed, which I guess means that it was more or less ok. Technically speaking the service was reliable. From a moderation standpoint I’m sure I missed a lot of things, but the only decision they made that I remember as creating a lot of discussion was the ban of Donald Trump, which I personally consider understandable.
With the takeover by Elon it just became really clear to me how much it’s not ok to have a private company managing a service of such importance. The guy is filthy rich but has still one obsession: make the service profitable by any means. He’s destroying the whole thing in front of us but well, he owns it, what can we do?
My take is that a social media used for critical information at the scale of Twitter should be managed by a non-profit organization whose goal is to create, scale and maintain the platform from a technical standpoint, but also to moderate its content by creating a committee composed by people from around the world, representative of all the users of the service, who would be entitled to edict its rules. Moreover the whole thing shouldn’t be spoiled by ads, it should run on donations, like Wikipedia. We’re talking of a global public service, let’s ask the governments and companies that use it to give some cash for it, they have plenty.
At this point a lot of you must just wonder if I know Mastodon, isn’t it exactly what I’m talking about? Well, I love the project, truly, but I don’t think that it will ever replace Twitter for two reasons: it’s more complex to use than Twitter, and being decentralized it will never have a global moderation that really works. I will not even talk about the private alternatives to Twitter that exist today (yes, including Threads) as they are precisely private, and therefore necessarily inadequate in my opinion.
I’m the CTO of a Swiss company that develops software. We do a lot of complex web and mobile applications, and even if I have never worked on a project of the scale of Twitter I think that I have a pretty good idea of what it would require. My idea is that we could try to crowdfund the project with the goal of having a first version of the platform running by mid 2024. If my help is welcome I could take the technical lead for a while. I could also find an arrangement with my company to provide qualified resources at a reasonable price before the organization is able to recruit its own team.
I know that sounds crazy (or dumb), but I think that we really have an issue and we should address it.
What are your thoughts?