[untitled]
6 comments
https://archive.ph/XZMjY
(paraphrasing)
> (DOGE employees) have not been subject to rigorous ethics rules and lack training and experience to handle private, personal data — like Social Security numbers and bank account information.
An odd complaint in the context of data 1000x more sensitive being accessible to tens of thousands of employees (inc. private contractors) across other public entities and private companies. I.e. why target DOGE when the exact same thing happens every day everywhere else... Facebook, banks, email services, third parties, data brokers etc. The employees at those companies probably haven't had ethics rules (whatever those are?) applied to them. I can think of very few examples where entities expressly promise not to look at your data. I believe GitHub made a promise that no human would see your contents of a private GitHub repo. But that's the only counter-example I can think of.
> (DOGE employees) have not been subject to rigorous ethics rules and lack training and experience to handle private, personal data — like Social Security numbers and bank account information.
An odd complaint in the context of data 1000x more sensitive being accessible to tens of thousands of employees (inc. private contractors) across other public entities and private companies. I.e. why target DOGE when the exact same thing happens every day everywhere else... Facebook, banks, email services, third parties, data brokers etc. The employees at those companies probably haven't had ethics rules (whatever those are?) applied to them. I can think of very few examples where entities expressly promise not to look at your data. I believe GitHub made a promise that no human would see your contents of a private GitHub repo. But that's the only counter-example I can think of.
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
No shit