> There's probably less than a few thousand people on earth with the level of skill and expertise to build something at the scale of UE4
Thankfully, there are millions of people who can build something at the scale of linux or firefox. Why else would it be possible for them to be open source?
Yes, because if cryptocurrencies became the standard, armies will become obsolete and Nation states will dissolve their Military programs. Makes sense.
No they aren't. A macro solution is always less readable and less performant than a proper compiler feature.
But you can't get a compiler feature for everything. People have different needs for different tasks and doing all of it in the compiler is just not going to work. Macros allow programmers to implement features that would otherwise take years (if not decades) of standardization to be accepted in a language.
LMAO. Using a notebook with executable code is literally the modern version of Knuth's literate programming.
While I personally don't do much of it, I loved Peter Norvig's python notebooks[1]. Go through one of them and tell me it's not a good aid in teaching people concepts.
It's not that difficult. The names are different but they "make sense". It's like 'fifteen', 'sixteen' and 'seventeen' stretched up to 100. Different names, but the pattern is sort of obvious with a few exceptions here and there.
Maybe because the author found out about GnuCash today and wanted to share? https://xkcd.com/1053/