HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

Hauthorn

no profile record

comments

Hauthorn
·ano passado·discuss
This is in fact not how a chess engine works. It has an evaluation function that assigns a numerical value (score) based on a number of factors (material advantage, king "safety", pawn structure etc).

These heuristics are certainly "good enough" that Stockfish is able to beat the strongest humans, but it's rarely possible for a chess engine to determine if a position results in mate.

I guess the question is whether we can write a good enough objective function that would encapsulate all the relevant attributes of "good code".
Hauthorn
·ano passado·discuss
I think watchmakers have been pushing this for quite a while.

If you want more recent examples, see Richard Mille.
Hauthorn
·ano passado·discuss
I think you work in different domains.

Expecting a good outcome is different from expecting to get exactly what you intended.

Formal specifications are useful in some lines of work and for some projects, less so for others.

Wicked problems would be one example where formal specs are impossible by definition.
Hauthorn
·ano passado·discuss
I believe this is a capability that the Switchblade 600 or STM KARGU already has.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STM_Kargu