The sad-irony here is, the very same wound up individuals don't give anything emotion-wise if a childs rights are violated on a non-sexual basis.
Sweatshops to glue those phones, shoes and shirts together? Not a problem.
Beating them for religious reasons.
Not a problem.
Starving them for social ideologies.
Thats okay, they are responsible for themselves.
As seen in WW2 and later crimes. Genocide on families (including children), okay, as long as you don't have to witness it and can make a profit from it.
Its really only sexual crimes that get monsters to rage at monsters.
It must be some primal instinct, that is completely detached from the crime and the victim itself. Its really all about the pure existence of the criminal.
This is just where society originates from, instincts allowing for the forming of social contracts.
For example if you exchanged resources with another party (your wife) for drugs and hugs, both sides would want for this contract to last.
So you need a third party, which can be forced by both sides to enforce the contract.
Enter the pedophiles and gays. Your wife is going to make certain you hate them and she can switch of that hate, via sanctioning there existence (e.g. church/political inclination). That instinct-switch is as important to her, as beauty is to you.
Now, ten years into a cellphone society, where even thought offenders soon will be blatant obvious by constant NN observation all that remains are the instincts.
The function is gone, but the gears of this bio-machinery still churn on.
I miss those days, where i still felt burning hatred for some Gears and was involved in affairs of the species in general. Life was so much easier if one just glued arguments to what one feels.
I looked into this whole messy affair, because one of those bastards tried to get on my younger brother when i was young. And for such there should be punishment, even a lifetime in prison.
But though crimes, like a deprecated bio-machine, masturbating to a Victorian child-labour-sweatshop , to prosecute those is foolish.
Its really only sexual crimes that get monsters to rage at monsters. It must be some primal instinct, that is completely detached from the crime and the victim itself. Its really all about the pure existence of the criminal.