I would highly recommend https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rT4WjLWRRrw
(specifically "part 2: Gender" and "Part 3 Labels"). If you want ramblings continue reading but really the video is much better.
The answer that I have come to is that the term 'woman' is vague, it means different things to different people, and that's ok. Defining a group based on difference like you have makes things needlessly complicated, for example what is chair?:
As we have all come to understand in recent years, CHAIRS can HAVE WHEEL, but CHAIRS can also HAVE LEGS . They can have a BACK, or they can lack them. They can be WELL BUILT or they can be WEAK . They can be strong or they can be weak. They can be short or they can be tall. What does the word CHAIR mean? It seems like a word that doesn't mean anything at all?
A chair is something you perceive as a chair and a woman is someone you perceive as a woman. Thus, to identify as woman means you would like to be perceived as a woman with whatever baggage comes attached with the person's concept of women. To that end you 'do woman'
TLDR: Author believes that women = "adult human females" and provides "proofs" that "show" a distinction between being treated as a woman and actually being one.
The author of this does not seems to understand how iff statements work which is hilarious.
This reminded me of Invariant Risk Minimization (IRM) (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.02893.pdf) due to the linear bound being sufficient to control the features.
Do you have any comments/insight into how you’d say they’re similar/different? Thanks!