Wow. The delta between the entitlement that you have for your "second full time job" and your expectations vs the reality of the history of people going to work is pretty astounding.
If that's the case, be demonstrable then. Given the physical size of the virus vs the size of holes in say, a cotton mask, combined with the infection rates for the strictest masking areas, I would say your statement is demonstrably false.
I switched to Dynadot years ago since they hosted wikileaks. If figured if they could handle that domain they could take care of anything of mine. Nice interface, never any issues.
However, I think it's a harder case to argue when twitter stock closed at $.18 above the price they went public at in 2013. Sounds like whatever it is they have been doing hasn't been in the interest of the average shareholder either.
This is the natural reaction to the implementation of various fiscal policies by the US. This sort of flat and reduced market is historically consistent.
It mutates because people keep vaxxing and creating new reasons for it to mutate. Also odd how there were thousand of deaths from the flu...and then zero, but fortunately, hospitals were paid for C-19 deaths. Totally normal.
I think the bigger issue is finding the places where strict mask use has reduced COVID. You seem to think there is a lesson to be learned however I'm unable to find any data that support that lesson. Yet, you assert it like it's truth, as if you know the truth and can back it up somehow, but you don't.
There in-lies the problem. "Hate speech" is just speech you don't like or choose to be offended by. You have no problem with "hate speech" that suits you and your political worldview.
Between the intentional suppression of this and HCQ, I wonder if people will ever be brought up on charges for the people they killed. There was intent and billions on the line.