One approach you could take is to license the code (or simply the tricks) to big tech companies. They can use the tricks, but must pay you x amount. You can provide technical support for implementation and benchmarking.
That's how I would make profit from what you're doing as many big tech companies have already achieved (and more) of what you claim.
I know this as I work in such a company. However, I'd bet they'd pay a fair amount for new solutions that differ from their own.
You're right - not ideal to manually transfer. Maybe iCloud will offer transcoding as a service next haha.
Many smartphones support recording H.265 encoded video directly and the resulting file size is tiny and quality is amazing. Not sure if it's the default setting (or possible) on iPhones though.
Why not transcode the data after use to significantly reduce filesize? If the videos are uploaded elsewhere (e.g., YT) they're most certainly transcoded on such services anyway
My point was that I have never heard anyone describe a server or serverless in that way: as simply a process. I agree that thinking about server as a process/Daemon is a great way to frame serverless.
I've also not considered that wireless headphones have wires so it's been fun to think about that too.
Obviously there are edge cases when applying statistical tools at a population level. That's not the purpose of BMI though. If you're pregnant or weight training then OBVIOUSLY your BMI score is not comparable to others. Most people are neither pregnant nor weight training. I'd even bet that most people haven't performed a weighted squat.
>> I also think it is becoming apparent that weight alone is not as useful of a metric as was once believed.
Being fat is bad for your health. That is a fact. No amount of body positivity advertisements will change that fact. It is healthier to be thinner than obese. Look at the graph above to see BMIs impact on other health outcomes.
Also, if you think the obesity crisis is fake/blown up then simply go outside in most American cities and you'll see that many people are obese.
> There is a subset of people who are being misidentified as unhealthy or overweight. Idk how large it is but it seems significant.
Again, this is not relevant as the subset of people is so small compared with the whole population.
The "data given" is included in BMI. Your relative weight is an indicator of multiple other health outcomes.
I appreciate this may not have been the case (sorry OP), which is why I asked the above question.